Back

Clinical factors associated with racial differences in the prevalence of occult hypoxemia: a retrospective case-control study

Mettler, S. K.; Charoenngam, N.; Jaroenlapnopparat, A. K.; Tern, C.; Xanthavanij, N.; Economidou, S.; Strand, M.; Hobbs, B. D.; Moll, M.; Cho, M. H.

2024-03-29 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.03.28.24305036 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecent studies showed that Black patients more often have falsely normal oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry compared to White patients. However, whether the racial differences in occult hypoxemia are mediated by other clinical differences is unknown. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective case-control study utilizing two large ICU databases (eICU and MIMIC-IV). We defined occult hypoxemia as oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry within 92-98% despite oxygen saturation on arterial blood gas below 90%. We assessed associations of commonly measured clinical factors with occult hypoxemia using multivariable logistic regression and conducted mediation analysis of the racial effect. ResultsAmong 24,641 patients, there were 1,855 occult hypoxemia cases and 23,786 controls. In both datasets, Black patients were more likely to have occult hypoxemia (unadjusted odds ratio 1.66 [95%-CI: 1.41-1.95] in eICU and 2.00 [95%-CI: 1.22-3.14] in MIMIC-IV). In multivariable models, higher respiratory rate, PaCO2 and creatinine as well as lower hemoglobin were associated with increased odds of occult hypoxemia. Differences in the commonly measured clinical markers accounted for 9.2% and 44.4% of the racial effect on occult hypoxemia in eICU and MIMIC-IV, respectively. ConclusionClinical differences, in addition to skin tone, might mediate some of the racial differences in occult hypoxemia.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.