Assessing Post-TAVR Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities Risk Using a Digital Twin of a Beating Heart
Reza, S.; Kovarovic, B.; Bluestein, D.
Show abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly displaced surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, certain post-TAVR complications persist, with cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) being one of the major ones. The elevated pressure exerted by the TAVR stent onto the conduction fibers situated between the aortic annulus and the His bundle, in proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node, may disrupt the cardiac conduction leading to the emergence of CCA. In his study, an in-silico framework was developed to assess the CCA risk, incorporating the effect of a dynamic beating heart and pre-procedural parameters such as implantation depth and preexisting cardiac asynchrony in the new onset of post-TAVR CCA. A self-expandable TAVR device deployment was simulated inside an electro-mechanically coupled beating heart model in five patient scenarios, including three implantation depths, and two preexisting cardiac asynchronies: (i) a right bundle branch block (RBBB) and (ii) a left bundle branch block (LBBB). Subsequently, several biomechanical parameters were analyzed to assess the post-TAVR CCA risk. The results manifested a lower cumulative contact pressure on the conduction fibers following TAVR for aortic deployment (0.018 MPa) compared to baseline (0.29 MPa) and ventricular deployment (0.52 MPa). Notably, the preexisting RBBB demonstrated a higher cumulative contact pressure (0.34 MPa) compared to the baseline and preexisting LBBB (0.25 MPa). Deeper implantation and preexisting RBBB cause higher stresses and contact pressure on the conduction fibers leading to an increased risk of post-TAVR CCA. Conversely, implantation above the MS landmark and preexisting LBBB reduces the risk.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- In Silico Modeling of Transcatheter Heart Valve Oversizing and Ellipticity, Part I: Establishing Credibility of an Advanced Model 97%
- In Silico Modeling of Transcatheter Heart Valve Oversizing and Ellipticity, Part II: Effects on Leaflet Mechanics, Hemodynamics, and Stent Deflection Contributing to Thrombogenic Risk and Structural Degeneration 96%
- Computational hemodynamic indices to identify Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation degeneration 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pulmonary vein flow split effects in patient-specific simulations of left atrial flow 96%
- Deployment of a digital twin using the coupled momentum method for fluid-structure interaction: a case study for aortic aneurysm 96%
- Patient-specific analysis of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Computational Growth Framework for Biological Tissues: Application to Growth of Aortic Root Aneurysm Repaired by the V-shape Surgery 95%
- An Investigation into Patient-Specific 3D Printed Titanium Stents and the use of Etching to Overcome Selective Laser Melting Design Constraints. 93%
- Air leaks: stapling affects porcine lungs biomechanics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning prediction of cardiac resynchronisation therapy response from combination of clinical and model-driven data 96%
- Demonstration of Patient-Specific Simulations To Assess Left Atrial Appendage Thrombogenesis Risk 95%
- A compact multifunctional model of the rabbit atrioventricular node with dual pathways 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on TAVR Leaflet Thrombosis: A Fluid-structure Interaction Analysis 97%
- Impact of residual intimal flap displacement post-TEVAR on TBAD haemodynamics in compliant, patient-specific CFD simulations informed by MRI 96%
- Switching the left and the right hearts: A novel bi-ventricle mechanical support strategy with spared native single-ventricle 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.