Back

Hippocampal Signal Complexity and Rate-of-Change Predict Navigational Performance: Evidence from a Two-Week VR Training Program

Ozubko, J.; Campbell, M.; Verhayden, A.; Demetri, B.; Brady, M.; Sivashankar, Y.; Brunec, I. K.

2024-03-30 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.03.27.587026 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The hippocampus is believed to be an important region for spatial navigation, helping to represent the environment and plan routes. Evidence from rodents has suggested that the hippocampus processes information in a graded manner along its long-axis, with anterior regions encoding coarse information and posterior regions encoding fine-grained information. Brunec et al. (2018) demonstrated similar patterns in humans in a navigation paradigm, showing that the anterior-posterior gradient in representational granularity and the rate of signal change exist in the human hippocampus. However, the stability of these signals and their relationship to navigational performance remain unclear. In this study, we conducted a two-week training program where participants learned to navigate through a novel city environment. We investigated inter-voxel similarity (IVS) and temporal auto-correlation hippocampal signals, measures of representational granularity and signal change, respectively. Specifically, we investigated how these signals were influenced by navigational ability (i.e., stronger vs. weaker spatial learners), training session, and navigational dynamics. Our results revealed that stronger learners exhibited a clear anterior-posterior distinction in IVS in the right hippocampus, while weaker learners showed less pronounced distinctions. Additionally, lower general IVS levels in the hippocampus were linked to better early learning. Successful navigation was characterized by faster signal change, particularly in the anterior hippocampus, whereas failed navigation lacked the anterior-posterior distinction in signal change. These findings suggest that signal complexity and signal change in the hippocampus are important factors for successful navigation, with IVS representing information organization and auto-correlation reflecting moment-to-moment updating. These findings support the idea that efficient organization of scales of representation in an environment may be necessary for efficient navigation itself. Understanding the dynamics of these neural signals provides insights into the mechanisms underlying navigational learning in humans.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
24
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%