Back

Fast exploration is coupled with a less choosy but more reactive learning style in a generalist predator

Kuo, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.-H.; Meng, A.-C.; Wu, Y.-Z.; Yang, S.-Y.; Yeh, C.-N.

2024-03-29 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.03.26.586890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The hypothesis of slow-fast syndromes predicts a correspondence between personality type and learning style; fast explorers would have a more proactive (fast but inflexible) learning style and slow explorers would be more reactive (slow but flexible) learners. Empirical evidence for this personality-cognition coupling remains inconclusive and heavily biased towards birds. Moreover, most studies did not examine the personality-cognition correlation when the cognitive task is discerning food quality, a scenario directly related to energy acquisition that underpins the evolution of slow-fast syndromes. In this study, we examined the exploration-cognition correlation in the context of avoidance learning in an opportunistic predator - the common sun skink Eutropis multifasciata. We quantified exploration tendencies of individuals in an unfamiliar environment and compared foraging behaviours when lizards associated prey colour and quality during the initial learning trials and subsequent reverse learning trials, where the prey colour-taste combinations were switched. We found that fast explorers were less choosy but more reactive foragers, whereas slow explorers exhibited the opposite learning style. Interestingly, there was no evidence for a learning speed-flexibility trade-off. Our findings are in contrast with conventional predictions and suggest that the two types of exploration-cognition coupling could be different viable responses to fast-changing environmental predictability.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.5%
2
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
18
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
23
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%