FLIGHTED: Inferring Fitness Landscapes from Noisy High-Throughput Experimental Data
Sundar, V.; Tu, B.; Guan, L.; Esvelt, K.
Show abstract
Machine learning (ML) for protein design requires large protein fitness datasets generated by high-throughput experiments for training, fine-tuning, and benchmarking models. However, most models do not account for experimental noise inherent in these datasets, harming model performance and changing model rankings in benchmarking studies. Here we develop FLIGHTED, a Bayesian method of accounting for uncertainty by generating probabilistic fitness landscapes from noisy high-throughput experiments. We demonstrate how FLIGHTED can improve model performance on two categories of experiments: single-step selection assays, such as phage display and SELEX, and a novel high-throughput assay called DHARMA that ties activity to base editing. We then compare the performance of standard machine-learning models on fitness landscapes generated with and without FLIGHTED. Accounting for noise significantly improves model performance, especially of CNN architectures, and changes relative rankings on numerous common benchmarks. Based on our new benchmarking with FLIGHTED, data size, not model scale, currently appears to be limiting the performance of protein fitness models, and the choice of top model architecture matters more than the protein language model embedding. Collectively, our results indicate that FLIGHTED can be applied to any high-throughput assay and any machine learning model, making it straightforward for protein designers to account for experimental noise when modeling protein fitness.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hi-C-LSTM: Learning representations of chromatin contacts using a recurrent neural network identifies genomic drivers of conformation 96%
- Single-cell DNA replication dynamics in genomically unstable cancers 96%
- scDREAMER: atlas-level integration of single-cell datasets using deep generative model paired with adversarial classifier 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.