Back

A Multiparametric Analysis Reveals Differential Behavior of Spheroid Cultures on Distinct Ultra-Low Attachment Plates Types

Vitacolonna, M.; Bruch, R.; Agaci, A.; Nuernberg, E.; Cesetti, T.; Keller, F.; Padovani, F.; Sauer, S.; Schmoller, K. M.; Reischl, M.; Hafner, M.; Rudolf, R.

2024-03-29 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.03.26.586778 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spheroids have become principal three-dimensional biological models to study cancer, developmental processes, and drug efficacy. For spheroid generation, ultra-low attachment plates are noteworthy due to their simplicity, compatibility with automation, and experimental and commercial accessibility. Nonetheless, it is unknown whether and to what degree the plate type impacts spheroid formation and biology. This study employed automated brightfield microscopy to systematically compare the size and eccentricity of spheroids formed in six different plate types using four distinct human cell lines, i.e., CCD-1137Sk fibroblasts, HaCaT keratinocytes, and MDA-MB-231 and HT-29 cancer cells. Results showed that all plate types exhibited similar sphe-roid-forming capabilities, and the gross patterns of growth or shrinkage during four days after seeding were comparable. Yet, size and eccentricity varied systematically among specific cell lines and plate types. A confocal wholemount analysis by a novel pipeline of AI-based 3D-image analysis procedures revealed changes in cell proliferation, cell number, nuclear volume, and keratino-cyte differentiation, which were accompanied by altered YAP1-signals. The findings show that the plate type may influence the outcome of experimental campaigns. It is advisable to scan different plate types for the optimal configuration for a specific investigation instead of using one standard plate for all kinds of applications.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.8%
3
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
22
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%