A Novel Digital Twin Strategy to Examine the Implications of Randomized Control Trials for Real-World Populations
Thangaraj, P. M.; Vasisht Shankar, S.; Huang, S.; Nadkarni, G.; Mortazavi, B. J.; Oikonomou, E. K.; Khera, R.
Show abstract
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are essential to guide medical practice; however, their generalizability to a given population is often uncertain. We developed a statistically informed Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) model, RCT-Twin-GAN, that leverages relationships between covariates and outcomes and generates a digital twin of an RCT (RCT-Twin) conditioned on covariate distributions from a second patient population. We used RCT-Twin-GAN to reproduce treatment effect outcomes of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial, which tested the same intervention but found different treatment effects. To demonstrate treatment effect estimates of each RCT conditioned on the other RCTs patient population, we evaluated the cardiovascular event-free survival of SPRINT digital twins conditioned on the ACCORD cohort and vice versa (ACCORD twins conditioned on SPRINT). The conditioned digital twins were balanced across intervention and control arms (mean absolute standardized mean difference (MASMD) of covariates between treatment arms 0.019 (SD 0.018), and the conditioned covariates of the SPRINT-Twin on ACCORD were more similar to ACCORD than SPRINT (MASMD 0.0082 SD 0.016 vs. 0.46 SD 0.20). Notably, across iterations, SPRINT conditioned ACCORD-Twin datasets reproduced the overall non-significant effect size seen in ACCORD (5-year cardiovascular outcome hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.88 (0.73-1.06) in ACCORD vs. median 0.87 (0.68-1.13) in the SPRINT conditioned ACCORD-Twin), while the ACCORD conditioned SPRINT-Twins reproduced the significant effect size seen in SPRINT (0.75 (0.64-0.89) vs. median 0.79 (0.72-0.86)) in the ACCORD conditioned SPRINT-Twin). Finally, we demonstrate the translation of this approach to real-world populations by conditioning the trials on an electronic health record population. Therefore, RCT-Twin-GAN simulates the direct translation of RCT-derived treatment effects across various patient populations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Design and Natural Language Processing to Reduce Bias in Electronic Health Records Research: The Community Care Cohort Project 96%
- Federated Target Trial Emulation using Distributed Observational Data for Treatment Effect Estimation 95%
- Identification of Digital Twins to Guide Interpretable AI for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Heart Failure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic score informed by genome-wide association studies of multiple ancestries and related traits improves risk prediction for coronary artery disease 94%
- Genome-wide polygenic score with APOL1 risk genotypes predicts chronic kidney disease across major continental ancestries 93%
- Zero-shot drug repurposing with geometric deep learning and clinician centered design 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.