Back

Optimisation of SARS-CoV-2 culture from clinical samples for clinical trial applications

Wooding, D.; Buist, K.; Romero Ramirez, A. I.; Savage, H.; Watkins, R.; Bengey, D.; Greenland-Bews, C.; Thompson, C. R.; Kontogianni, N.; Body, R.; Hayward, G.; Byrne, R. L. L.; Gould, S.; CONDOR Steering Group, ; Myerscough, C.; Atkinson, B.; Shaw, V.; Greenhalf, B.; Adams, E.; Cubas-Atienzar, A.; Khoo, S.; Fletcher, T.; Edwards, T.

2024-03-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.03.25.24304829 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics often include virological secondary endpoints to compare viral clearance and viral load reduction between treatment and placebo arms. This is typically achieved using RT-qPCR, which cannot differentiate replicant competent virus from non-viable virus or free RNA, limiting its utility as an endpoint. Culture based methods for SARS-CoV-2 exist; however, these are often insensitive and poorly standardised for use as clinical trial endpoints. We report optimisation of a culture-based approach evaluating three cell lines, three detection methods, and key culture parameters. We show that Vero-ACE2-TMPRSS2 (VAT) cells in combination with RT-qPCR of culture supernatants from the first passage provides the greatest overall detection of Delta viral replication (22/32, 68.8%), being able to identify viable virus in 83.3% (20/24) of clinical samples with initial Ct values <30. Likewise, we demonstrate that RT-qPCR using culture supernatants from the first passage of Vero hSLAM cells provides the highest overall detection of Omicron viral replication (9/31, 29%), detecting live virus in 39.1% (9/23) of clinical samples with initial Ct values < 25. This assessment demonstrates that combining RT-qPCR with virological end point analysis has utility in clinical trials of therapeutics for SARS-CoV-2; however, techniques may require optimising based on dominant circulating strain.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.