Selective Posterior Cerebral Artery Wada Better Predicts Good Memory and Naming Outcomes Following Selective Stereotactic Thermal Ablation for Medial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Than Internal Carotid Artery Wada
Drane, D.; Acerbo, E.; Rodgers, A.; Pedersen, N.; Williamson, A.; Stern, M.; Dickey, A.; Howard, B. M.; Bearden, D. J.; Okada, N.; Staikova, E.; Gutekunst, C.-A.; Alwaki, A.; Gershon, T.; Jirsa, V.; Gross, R.; Loring, D. W.; Kheder, A.; Willie, J. T.
Show abstract
The conventional intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) test has been used to assess memory function in patients being considered for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery. Minimally invasive approaches that target the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and spare neocortex are increasingly used, but a knowledge gap remains in how to assess memory and language risk from these procedures. We retrospectively compared results of two versions of the Wada test, the intracarotid artery (ICA-Wada) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA-Wada) approaches, with respect to predicting subsequent memory and language outcomes, particularly after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH). We included all patients being considered for SLAH who underwent both ICA-Wada and PCA-Wada at a single institution. Memory and confrontation naming assessments were conducted using standardized neuropsychological tests to assess pre- to post-surgical changes in cognitive performance. Of 13 patients who initially failed the ICA-Wada, only one patient subsequently failed the PCA-Wada (p=0.003, two-sided binomial test with p0=0.5) demonstrating that these tests assess different brain regions or networks. PCA-Wada had a high negative predictive value for the safety of SLAH, compared to ICA-Wada, as none of the patients who underwent SLAH after passing the PCA-Wada experienced catastrophic memory decline (0 of 9 subjects, p<.004, two-sided binomial test with p0=0.5), and all experienced a good cognitive outcome. In contrast, the single patient who received a left anterior temporal lobectomy after failed ICA- and passed PCA-Wada experienced a persistent, near catastrophic memory decline. On confrontation naming, few patients exhibited disturbance during the PCA-Wada. Following surgery, SLAH patients showed no naming decline, while open resection patients, whose surgeries all included ipsilateral temporal lobe neocortex, experienced significant naming difficulties (Fishers exact test, p<.05). These findings demonstrate that (1) failing the ICA-Wada falsely predicts memory decline following SLAH, (2) PCA-Wada better predicts good memory outcomes of SLAH for MTLE, and (3) the MTL brain structures affected by both PCA-Wada and SLAH are not directly involved in language processing.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ablation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Hyperintensity Clusters and Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Improves Seizure Outcomes after Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy 96%
- Uncovering Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Corticothalamic Network during Seizures 93%
- Brief Apnea and Hypoventilation Reduces Seizure Duration and Shifts Seizure Location for Several Hours in a Model of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote effects of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: long-term morphological changes after surgical resection 94%
- Noninvasive Brain Stimulation as Focal Epilepsy Treatment in the Hospital, Clinic, and Home 93%
- Frequency of and factors associated with antiseizure medication discontinuation discussions and decisions in patients with epilepsy: a multicenter retrospective chart review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision Mapping of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Positions Associated with the Microlesion Effect in Tourette Syndrome 91%
- Adverse Events in Surgical Neurology: The Novel Therapy-Disability-Neurology (TDN) Grade 89%
- Deep brain stimulation improves symptoms of spasmodic dysphonia through targeting of thalamic sensorimotor connectivity 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.