Edinger-Westphal ghrelin receptor signalling regulates binge alcohol consumption in a sex specific manner
Pearl, A.; Pinares-Garcia, P.; Shesham, A.; Maddern, X.; Anversa, R.; Brown, R.; Reed, F. M.; Giardino, W.; Lawrence, A. J.; Walker, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundRates of risky drinking are continuing to rise, particularly in women, yet sex as a biological variable has been largely ignored. An emerging yet understudied potential component of this circuitry is the central projecting Edinger-Westphal (EWcp), which is made up of two prominent, but distinct cell populations expressing either an array of neuropeptides (including cocaine and amphetamine regulated transcript; CART) or vGlut2 (glutamatergic). MethodsHere, we use a combination of approaches including genetic, molecular biology, behavioural testing, and electrophysiology to understand how the EWcp contributes to alcohol consumption in female versus male mice. ResultsChemogenetic inhibition of EWcpCART cells reduced binge drinking specifically in female, but not male mice. Further, inhibition of EWcpCART cells prevented ghrelin induced drinking, and viral-mediated ghrelin receptor (Ghsr) knockdown in the EWcp reduced binge drinking in female, but not male mice. RNAscope revealed Ghsr expression across peptidergic (marked by CART) and glutamatergic populations in the EWcp, with neurons from female mice more sensitive to bath application of ghrelin than male mice. Targeted knockdown of Ghsr from distinct EWcp populations revealed GHSR signalling on peptidergic, but not glutamatergic cells mediate binge drinking in female mice. Finally, both a GHSR inverse agonist and antagonist delivered directly within the EWcp reduced binge drinking in female mice. ConclusionsThese findings suggest the EWcp is a region mediating excessive alcohol bingeing through GHSR actions on peptidergic cells (CART-expressing) in female mice and expand our understanding of the neural mechanism(s) underpinning how the ghrelin system mediates alcohol consumption.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethanol's interaction with BK channel α subunit residue K361 does not mediate behavioral responses to alcohol in mice 96%
- Kappa Opioid Receptor and Dynorphin Signaling in the Central Amygdala Regulates Alcohol Intake 95%
- Hypodopaminergic state of the nigrostriatal pathway drives compulsive alcohol use 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex- and Subtype-Specific Adaptations in Excitatory Signaling Onto Deep-Layer Prelimbic Cortical Pyramidal Neurons After Chronic Alcohol Exposure 96%
- Histone H3 dopaminylation in ventral tegmental area underlies heroin-induced maladaptive plasticity 94%
- Release of endogenous dynorphin opioids in the prefrontal cortex disrupts cognition 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute and chronic alcohol modulation of extended amygdala calcium dynamics 96%
- Lateral hypothalamus CRFR1 regulation of chronic binge drinking: divergence along anterior-posterior axis 96%
- Dynamic regulation of CeA gene expression during acute and protracted abstinence from chronic binge drinking of male and female C57BL/6J mice. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mediodorsal thalamus of alcohol-dependent mice shows genetic and physiological adaptations and alcohol-biased calcium signaling 95%
- Anterior cingulate cortex activation of claustrum projection neuron subtypes is enhanced by alcohol 94%
- Non-Consummatory Behavior Signals Predict Aversion-Resistant Alcohol Drinking in Head-Fixed Mice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alcohol Drinking Alters Stress Response to Predator Odor via Extended Amygdala Kappa Opioid Receptor Signaling in Male Mice 94%
- Alcohol Attenuates CRF-Induced Excitatory Effects from the Extended Amygdala to Dorsostriatal Cholinergic Interneurons 94%
- A preclinical model of THC edibles that produces high-dose cannabimimetic responses. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.