Back

Toxin-glycolipid interactions measured by imaging surface plasmon resonance on artificial membranes predicts diffusion behavior and lipid dependence of binding to cells

Lehnert, S.; Yildiz, U. H.; Haustein, N.; Li, E.; Matysik, A.; Oglecka, K.; Rashid, R.; Boschke, E.; Liedberg, B.; Wohland, T.; Kraut, R.

2024-03-27 cell biology
10.1101/2024.03.22.586282 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Membrane-protein interactions mediate cellular invasion by toxins, and are thought to involve organized plasma membrane lipid domains, often containing glycolipids, other sphingolipids, and/or cholesterol. Here, we characterize an isolated glycolipid-interacting domain of the tetanus toxin heavy chain (Hc) as a fluorescently labelled peptide, TeNT46, and describe its membrane dynamics and binding characteristics on artificial bilayers and cellular membranes. We show that this novel ganglioside-interacting probe TeNT46 retains the glycolipid binding preferences of the parent toxin, using imaging-SPR (iSPR) on a micro-patterned hybrid bilayer surface. On live cell membranes, using fluorescence correlation spectroscopic (FCS) diffusion measurements to compare TeNT46 to the well-studied GM1-binding toxin CTxB, we find that both probes display ordered domain-binding characteristics, but distinct cholesterol and sphingolipid dependencies. Strikingly, the contrasting lipid requirements of TeNT46 from those of CTxB in cells are predicted by their iSPR binding preferences on hybrid synthetic membranes. Based on the combined findings from iSPR and FCS, we propose a model for toxin-membrane interaction whereby a unique lipid constellation determines optimum binding for each probe independently of lateral confinement, which is more generally imposed by cholesterol. Our resulting understanding of the specific lipid requirements of these toxin targets and their dynamics in cell membranes could be important for the future design of preventive membrane-based nano-decoys and cell-delivery tools.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
2
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
8.0%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.0%
4
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.6%
6
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
9
Biology of the Cell
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
13
Journal of Lipid Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
14
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
15
Glycobiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
17
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
22
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Cellular Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
25
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
29
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%