Back

Space-time dynamics of genome replication studied with super-resolved microscopy

Gelleri, M.; Sterr, M.; Strickfaden, H.; Cremer, C.; Cremer, T.; Cremer, M.

2024-03-22 cell biology
10.1101/2024.03.22.586000 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome replication requires duplication of the complete set of DNA sequences together with nucleosomes and epigenetic signatures. Notwithstanding profound knowledge on mechanistic details of DNA replication, major problems of genome replication have remained unresolved. In this perspective article, we consider the accessibility of replication machines to all DNA sequences in due course, the maintenance of functionally important positional and structural features of chromatid domains during replication, and the rapid transition of CTs into prophase chromosomes with two chromatids. We illustrate this problem with EdU pulse-labeling (10 min) and chase experiments (80 min) performed with mouse myeloblast cells. Following light optical serial sectioning of nuclei with 3D structured illumination microscopy (SIM), seven DNA intensity classes were distinguished as proxies for increasing DNA compaction. In nuclei of cells fixed immediately after the pulse-label, we observed a relative under-representation of EdU-labeled DNA in low DNA density classes, representing the active nuclear compartment (ANC), and an over-representation in high density classes representing the inactive nuclear compartment (INC). Cells fixed after the chase revealed an even more pronounced shift to high DNA intensity classes. This finding contrasts with previous studies of the transcriptional topography demonstrating an under-representation of epigenetic signatures for active chromatin and RNAPII in high DNA intensity classes and their over-representation in low density classes. We discuss these findings in the light of current models viewing CDs either as structural chromatin frameworks or as phase-separated droplets, as well as methodological limitations that currently prevent an integration of this contrasting evidence for the spatial nuclear topography of replication and transcription into a common framework of the dynamic nuclear architecture.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
2
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
3
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
4
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
9
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
11
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
12
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
13
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
14
Nucleus
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
18
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
21
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
25
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%