Preoperative activation of the Renin-Angiotensin system and myocardial injury in noncardiac surgery: Post Hoc Analysis of the SPACE randomised controlled Trial.
Gutierrez del Arroyo, A.; Abbott, T. E. F.; Patel, A.; Begum, S.; Dias, P.; Brealey, D.; Pearse, R. M.; Kapil, V.; Ackland, G. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundHypertension therapy in older adults is often suboptimal, in part due to inadequate suppression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). We hypothesised that distinct endotypes of RAAS activation before noncardiac surgery are associated with increased risk of myocardial injury. MethodsThis was a pre-specified analysis of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN17251494) which randomised patients [≥]60 years undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery to either continue, or stop, RAAS inhibitors (determined by pharmacokinetic profiles). Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis identified distinct groups of patients with similar RAAS activation from samples obtained before induction of anesthesia, quantified by enzyme-linked immunoassays for plasma renin, aldosterone, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and dipeptidyl peptidase-3 (DPP3). The primary outcome, masked to investigators and participants, was myocardial injury (plasma high-sensitivity troponin-T). ResultsWe identified three clusters, with similar proportions of RAAS inhibitors randomised to stop/continue. Cluster 1 (n=52; mean age (SD), 75{+/-}8 years; 54% female) and cluster 3 (n=25; 75{+/-}6 years; 44% female) had higher rates of myocardial injury (23/52 (44%) and 13/25 (52%), respectively), compared with 51/164 (31.1%) in cluster 2 (n=153; 70{+/-}6 years; 46% female; odds ratio:1.95, 95% CI:1.12-3.39, p=0.018). Cluster 2 was characterized by lower NT-proBNP (mean difference, 698pg.ml-1, 95% CI, 576-820) and higher renin (mean difference:350pg.ml-1, 95% CI:123-577), compared with clusters 1 and 3 with the higher rate of myocardial injury. ConclusionEffective preoperative RAAS inhibition is associated with lower risk of myocardial injury before non-cardiac surgery, independent of stopping/continuing RAAS inhibitors before surgery.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated heart rate after non-cardiac surgery: post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational cohort study 94%
- microRNA signatures of perioperative myocardial injury after elective non-cardiac surgery: prospective observational cohort study 93%
- Effect of Machine Learning on Anaesthesiology Clinician Prediction of Postoperative Complications: The Perioperative ORACLE Randomised Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiovascular risk factors are independently associated with COVID-19 mortality: a prospective cohort study 93%
- History of coronary heart disease increases the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients: a nested case-control study 90%
- Outcome Disparities by Insurance Plan and Educational Attainment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aptamer Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 93%
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 93%
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 94%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 93%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.