Automated Detection of Sleep Apnea Using Machine Learning: A Novel Approach Using Smartphone and Microphone for Breathing Sound Analysis
Bhatt, O.
Show abstract
In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of a novel setup in the detection of apneas and hypopneas and estimating the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). The study device setup consists of a microphone placed underneath the nose and a smartphone to collect the data. We recruited patients who were referred to the St. Josephs Hamilton Sleep Clinic for a sleep study. Data from our study device is collected simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG) in the sleep lab. A total of 26 patients were recruited, of which 2 dropped out during the data collection. Data from the microphone was too noisy for interpretation in 3 patients. Across the remaining 21 patients, the AHI based on their PSG ranged from 2 to 125 events/h, with an average AHI of 34 events/h. We used regression models trained on microphone audio data to identify noise and we developed an algorithm based on root-mean-square of the audio data for automatic detection of apneas and hypopneas. With reference to the PSG, our study device had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 87% in detecting apneas/hypopneas across a cumulative 120.9 hours of sleep data and more than 3700 such events. Our study device was able to accurately predict the AHI to within 4.3 events/h (+/-3.1). As such, we can conclude that our study device is accurate in identifying apneas/hypopneas, estimating the AHI and at ruling out cases of severe sleep apnea and can potentially be used as a screening test for this purpose. Our study device has the practical advantages of being very low cost and potentially more accessible as a screening tool, though further validation studies are needed to study accuracy across a larger population and for use at-home.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative detection of sleep apnea with wearable watch device 95%
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 95%
- Discrimination of sleep and wake periods from a hip-worn raw acceleration sensor using recurrent neural networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is sleep apnea-hypopnea index relevant for impaired brain perfusion and desaturation in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndromes? 94%
- Novel Digital Markers of Sleep Dynamics: A Causal Inference Approach Revealing Age and Gender Phenotypes in Obstructive Sleep Apnea 93%
- Transformers for rapid detection of airway stenosis and stridor 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Obstructive sleep apnea is highly prevalent in COVID19 moderate to severe ARDS survivors: Findings of level I Polysomnography in a tertiary care hospital 93%
- Correlation analysis of heart rate variations and glucose fluctuations during sleep 93%
- Methodological approach to sleep state misperception in insomnia disorder: comparison between multiple nights of actigraphy recordings and a single night of polysomnography recording 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnosing Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease: a diagnostic accuracy study of a smartphone delivered algorithm combining patient-reported symptoms and cough analysis for use in acute care consultations. 91%
- Multimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 89%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote-management of COPD: Evaluating Implementation of Digital Innovation to Enable Routine Care (RECEIVER) – Protocol for a feasibility and service adoption observational cohort study 90%
- A new method to measure inter-breath intervals in infants for the assessment of apnoea and respiratory dynamics 89%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.