Equalizing prognostic disparities in stage III KRAS-mutant NSCLC: addition of durvalumab to combined chemoradiotherapy improves survival
Eklund, E. A.; Orgard, M.; Wallin, D.; Sayin, S. I.; Fagman, H.; Raghavan, S.; Akyurek, L. M.; Nyman, J.; Wiel, C.; Hallqvist, A.; Sayin, V. I.
Show abstract
IntroductionStage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is heterogeneous and identification of subgroups with differential responses is crucial to optimize treatment. Addition of durvalumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has previously been shown to improve survival outcomes. Meanwhile, subgroups harboring KRAS mutations have been shown to have worse prognosis. We investigated whether KRAS mutational status may affect survival outcomes after adjuvant durvalumab following cCRT in stage III NSCLC. MethodsIn this retrospective study, we present a real-world dataset of all stage III NSCLC patients treated with cCRT with a curative intent and molecularly assessed between 2016-2021 in West Sweden. Primary study outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). ResultsWe identified 145 patients receiving cCRT with a curative intent, 32% harbored an activating mutation in the KRAS gene (KRASMUT). Compared to KRAS wild-type (KRASWT), KRASMUT had a worse OS (p=0.047) and PFS (p=0.038). The finding persisted on multivariate analysis with OS (HR 1.703, 95%CI 1.074-2.702, p = 0.024) and PFS (HR 1.628, 95% CI 1.081-2.453, p = 0.020). After the addition of durvalumab to cCRT, there were no longer any significant differences between KRASWT and KRASMUT in OS or PFS. ConclusionsKRAS mutations are a negative prognostic factor after cCRT in stage III NSCLC, and the addition of durvalumab equalizes the negative impact of harboring this mutation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- KRAS mutations impact clinical outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer 98%
- Machine learning for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer from simple clinical and biological data 94%
- Post-progression survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with anti-PD-1/PDL-1 monotherapy: progression after durable clinical benefit versus primary resistance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 94%
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 93%
- Cell-Free Tumor DNA Dominant Clone Allele Frequency (DCAF) Is Associated With Poor Outcomes In Advanced Biliary Cancers Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating tumor fraction analyses with ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing predict response to chemoradiation and recurrence in stage IV small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a longitudinal case study 93%
- Meta-Analysis of Adenoviral p53 Gene Therapy Clinical Trials in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma 92%
- An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Preclinical Models of Lung Cancer Drugs 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Compassionate use of recombinant human IL-7-hyFc as a salvage treatment for restoring lymphopenia in patients with recurrent glioblastoma 92%
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 91%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simplified Molecular Classification of Lung Adenocarcinomas Based on EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 Mutations 93%
- Feasibility of Administering Human Pancreatic Cancer Chemotherapy in a Spontaneous Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model 93%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.