The effect of corticosterone on the acquisition of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior is dependent on sex and vendor
Turfe, A.; Westbrook, S. R.; Lopez, S. A.; Chang, S. E.; Flagel, S.
Show abstract
Cues in the environment become predictors of biologically relevant stimuli, such as food, through associative learning. These cues can not only act as predictors but can also be attributed with incentive motivational value and gain control over behavior. When a cue is imbued with incentive salience, it attains the ability to elicit maladaptive behaviors characteristic of psychopathology. We can capture the propensity to attribute incentive salience to a reward cue in rats using a Pavlovian conditioned approach paradigm, in which the presentation of a discrete lever-cue is followed by the delivery of a food reward. Upon learning the cue-reward relationship, some rats, termed sign-trackers, develop a conditioned response directed towards the lever-cue; whereas others, termed goal-trackers, approach the food cup upon lever-cue presentation. Here, we assessed the effects of systemic corticosterone (CORT) on the acquisition and expression of sign- and goal-tracking behaviors in male and female rats, while examining the role of the vendor (Charles River or Taconic) from which the rats originated in these effects. Male and female rats from Charles River had a greater tendency to sign-track than those from Taconic. Administration of CORT enhanced the acquisition of sign-tracking behavior in males from Charles River and females from both vendors. Conversely, administration of CORT had no effect on the expression of the conditioned response. These findings demonstrate a role for CORT in cue-reward learning and suggest that inherent tendencies towards sign- or goal-tracking may interact with this physiological mediator of motivated behavior. HighlightsO_LIMale and female rats from Charles River exhibit more sign-tracking relative to those from Taconic. C_LIO_LICorticosterone increases the acquisition of sign-tracking in male rats from Charles River. C_LIO_LICorticosterone increases the acquisition of sign-tracking in female rats, regardless of vendor. C_LIO_LIThere is no effect of corticosterone on the expression of sign-tracking behavior in either male or female rats. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adolescent development of anxiety-related behavior and shifts in behavioral responsiveness to estradiol in female mice 95%
- Wistar rats and C57BL/6J mice differ in their motivation to seek social interaction versus food in the Social versus Food Preference Test 95%
- Divergent changes in social stress-induced motivation in male and female mice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mouse model of oral contraceptive exposure: depression, motivation, and the stress response 96%
- Sex differences in responses to aggressive encounters among California mice 95%
- Perinatal Opioid Exposure Leads to Decreased Social Play in Adolescent Male and Female Rats: Potential Role of Oxytocin Signaling in Brain Regions Associated with Social Reward 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Triggered Temptations: A New Procedure to Compare Reward-Seeking Behaviour Induced by Discriminative and Conditioned Stimuli in Rats 97%
- Heroin Choice Depends on Income Level and Economy Type 96%
- Long-term effects of THC exposure on reward learning and motivated behavior in adolescent and adult male rats 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased alcohol self-administration following exposure to the predator odor TMT in high stress-reactive female rats 96%
- Extended access self-administration of methamphetamine is associated with age- and sex-dependent differences in drug taking behavior and recognition memory deficits in rats 96%
- The Role of Context Conditioning in the Reinstatement of Responding to an Alcohol-Predictive Conditioned Stimulus 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.