Gene-based Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test using genotype count data identifies novel cancer-related genes
Nishino, J.; Miya, F.; Kato, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAn alternative approach to investigate associations between genetic variants and disease is to examine deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in genotype frequencies within a case population, instead of case-control association analysis. The HWE analysis distinctively requires disease cases without the need for controls and demonstrates a notable ability in mapping recessive variants. Allelic heterogeneity is a common phenomenon in diseases. While gene-based case-control association analysis successfully incorporates this heterogeneity, there are no such approaches for HWE analysis. Therefore, we proposed a gene-based HWE test (gene-HWT) by aggregating single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-level HWE test statistics in a gene to address allelic heterogeneity. ResultsThis method used only genotype count data and publicly available linkage disequilibrium information and has a very low computational cost. Extensive simulations demonstrated that gene-HWT effectively controls the type I error at a low significance level and outperforms SNP-level HWE test in power when there are multiple causal variants within a gene. Using gene-HWT, we analyzed genotype count data from genome-wide association study for six types of cancers in Japanese individuals and found that most of the genes detected are associated with cancers. In addition, we identified novel genes (AGBL3 and PSORS1C1), novel variants in CTSO known to be associated with breast cancer prognosis and drug sensitivity, and novel genes as germline factors, which have associations in gene expression or methylation status with cancers in the combined analysis of six types of cancers. ConclusionsThese findings indicate the potential of gene-HWT to elucidate the genetic basis of complex diseases, including cancer.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Bayesian Linear Regression Models for Gene Set Prioritization in Complex Diseases 95%
- Major sex differences in allele frequencies for X chromosome variants in the 1000 Genomes Project data 94%
- Tissue specificity-aware TWAS (TSA-TWAS) framework identifies novel associations with metabolic, immunologic, and virologic traits in HIV-positive adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel candidates of pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a 3,552 Japanese whole-genome sequence dataset (3.5KJPNv2) 94%
- HCLC-FC: a novel statistical method for phenome-wide association studies 94%
- Extreme value theory as a general framework for understanding mutation frequency distribution in cancer genomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlling for Human Population Stratification in Rare Variant Association Studies 94%
- Genetic profiling of Vietnamese population from large-scale genomic analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing data 94%
- Systematic dissection of biases in whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing reveals major determinants of coding sequence coverage 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- BinomiRare: A carriers-only test for association of rare genetic variants with a binary outcome for mixed models and any case-control proportion 95%
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population 94%
- Pleiotropy-guided transcriptome imputation from normal and tumor tissues identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast and ovarian cancer 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.