Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Colonoscopy Wait Times by Procedure Indication
Thibault, M.; Barkun, A.; Martel, M.; Russell, A. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatients are referred for colonoscopy for symptom assessment, screening, and surveillance. Public health measures to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted services and increased patient delays for colonoscopy services in Quebec. The differential impact of these interruptions by colonoscopy indication is largely unknown. MethodsUsing 2018-2022 retrospective clinical data from two high-volume Montreal endoscopy centres and provincial administrative data, we characterized changes in colonoscopy wait times and the proportion of waitlisted patients who were delayed (wait time exceeded provincial guidelines) by procedure indication and demographics. We used regression to examine patient characteristics associated with delayed procedures during pre- and intra-COVID-19 periods. We used time series analysis to characterize trends in the proportion of waitlisted patients delayed. ResultsThe COVID-19-related public health measures resulted in record-high delays (median increase in wait times of 34-159% across indications). While older patients experienced longer wait times pre-pandemic, intra-COVID-19 wait times increased disproportionately for patients younger than 50. The proportion of waitlisted patients delayed peaked mid-2020 (56.9% for screening; 56.0% for symptom assessment patients). By early 2022, the proportion delayed had fallen to 37.3% for screening patients but remained at 53.8% for symptom assessment patients. ConclusionsIn Quebec, intra-COVID-19 colonoscopy delays disproportionately impacted symptom assessment procedures and younger patients. Additional capacity or improved triaging may be needed to address persistent delays. Understanding the effects of the pandemic on colonoscopy services can help inform strategies to mitigate harms from on-going delays in Quebec.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Colorectal cancer screening based on predicted risk: a pilot randomized controlled trial 92%
- Strong reduction of distal colorectal cancer incidence and mortality but no reduction of proximal colon cancer after screening colonoscopy: prospective cohort study 92%
- Incidence, prevalence, and survival of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom from 2000-2021: a population-based cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of multivariable prediction models for adverse COVID-19 outcomes in IBD patients 91%
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 90%
- Viral And Antibody Testing For Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Factors Associated With Positivity In Electronic Health Records From The United States 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relative contribution of COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection to population-level seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies in a large integrated health system 90%
- Impacts of COVID-19 on long-term health and health care use 90%
- Determinants of hospital outcomes for COVID-19 infections in a large Pennsylvania Health System 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results to identify patients with symptoms at risk of colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients tested in primary care 92%
- Coding Long COVID: Characterizing a new disease through an ICD-10 lens 91%
- Describing the population experiencing COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough following second vaccination in England: A cohort study from OpenSAFELY 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.