Back

CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing in E. coli elevates the frequency of unintended mutations

Widney, K. A.; Yang, D.-d.; Rusch, L. M.; Copley, S. D.

2024-03-19 synthetic biology
10.1101/2024.03.19.584922 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cas-assisted lambda Red recombineering techniques have rapidly become a mainstay of bacterial genome editing. Such techniques have been used to construct both individual mutants and massive libraries to assess the effects of genomic changes. We have found that a commonly used Cas9-assisted editing method results in unintended mutations elsewhere in the genome in 26% of edited clones. The unintended mutations are frequently found over 200 kb from the intended edit site and even over 10 kb from potential off-target sites. We attribute the high frequency of unintended mutations to error-prone polymerases expressed in response to dsDNA breaks introduced at the edit site. Most unintended mutations occur in regulatory or coding regions and thus may have phenotypic effects. Our findings highlight the risks associated with genome editing techniques involving dsDNA breaks in E. coli and likely other bacteria and emphasize the importance of sequencing the genomes of edited cells to ensure the absence of unintended mutations. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=61 SRC="FIGDIR/small/584922v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (15K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@476263org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8c891eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7e32b4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@132d3fc_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
9
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
11
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
17
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
21
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%