Back

A Dynamic Time-Series Model of Oxygen Consumption during Paediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Sharabiani, M. T. A.; Issitt, R. W.; Mahani, A. S.; Srinivasan, Y.; Stoica, S.

2024-03-19 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.03.18.24304520 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBalancing oxygen supply and demand during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is crucial to minimise adverse outcomes. This is managed by adjusting oxygen delivery components - cardiac index (CI), haemoglobin concentration (Hb), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) - and metabolic demand through temperature (Temp) changes. The oxygen extraction ratio (OER) responds to these adjustments, affecting oxygen consumption, but this response is not well understood. We aimed to develop a mathematical model to capture OER dynamics during CPB and quantify oxygen demands dependence on temperature. MethodsWe developed GARIX, a time-series model predicting minute-by-minute OER changes during CPB, incorporating exogenous variables (CI, Hb, SaO2, Temp) and an equilibrium term representing the difference between oxygen consumption and temperature-dependent oxygen demand, modelled linearly per the vant Hoff specification (constant Q10). The model was trained on data from 343 CPB operations (20,000 minutes) in 334 paediatric patients at a UK centre (2019-2021). We used variable importance analysis and simulations to study the models properties. ResultsThe model shows OER adapts to align oxygen consumption with demand. The adaptive response has a rapid phase (<10 minutes) and a slower phase extending up to several hours. Equilibrium analysis yields Q10 = 2.25, indicating oxygen demand doubles with every 8.5{degrees}C increase in temperature during CPB. ConclusionsOur model provides a physiologically plausible framework for explaining OER changes during CPB, capturing dynamic adjustments and steady-state oxygen consumption. These findings highlight the value of mathematical modelling in estimating key oxygenation parameters like Q10, given limitations on clinical experimentation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.