Back

Decoding Prodromal Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Differences between Isolated Hyposmia and REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

Banerjee, L. V.; Pasquini, J.; Henderson, R.; Pavese, N.; Anderson, K.

2024-03-18 neurology
10.1101/2024.03.18.24304459 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe prodromal phase of Parkinsons disease (PD), much like the disease itself, displays marked heterogeneity, with varied rates of progression and symptom severities. A detailed clinical characterization of prodromal subgroups may provide useful insights for both clinical and research settings. ObjectivesTo compare clinical assessments in patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and those with isolated hyposmia. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 191 patients with iRBD, 213 patients with isolated hyposmia and 150 healthy controls recruited in the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative. The earliest available assessment for each participant was selected. Our analysis investigated and compared the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Scales for Outcomes in Parkinsons Disease Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT) and Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts I, II and III scores across the three groups. To assess differences, after adjusting for age and sex, we employed permutations testing. We further investigated the specific question items that contributed most significantly to the observed variations between the groups. ResultsWe found significant differences between the healthy control group and a combined prodromal group across all assessment categories, with prodromal participants displaying poorer scores. For between prodromal groups comparison, significant differences emerged in SCOPA-AUT and MDS-UPDRS Part I scores, with the iRBD group presenting with more severe scores. ConclusionOur study highlights that even in the premotor stage of PD, clinical distinctions exist in terms of autonomic burden between individuals with iRBD and those with isolated hyposmia.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.