Back

Chromosome-level Subgenome-aware de novo Assembly of Saccharomyces bayanus Provides Insight into Genome Divergence after Hybridization

Gardner, C.; Chen, J.; Hadfield, C.; Lu, Z.; Debruin, D.; Zhan, Y.; Donlin, M.; Lin, Z.; Ahn, T.-H.

2024-03-19 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.03.17.585453 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Interspecies hybridization is prevalent in various eukaryotic lineages and plays important roles in phenotypic diversification, adaption, and speciation. To better understand the changes that occurred in the different subgenomes of a hybrid species and how they facilitated adaptation, we completed chromosome-level de novo assemblies of all 16 pairs chromosomes for a recently formed hybrid yeast, Saccharomyces bayanus strain CBS380 (IFO11022), using Nanopore MinION long-read sequencing. Characterization of S. bayanus subgenomes and comparative analysis with the genomes of its parent species, S. uvarum and S. eubayanus, provide several new insights into understanding genome evolution after a relatively recent hybridization. For instance, multiple recombination events between the two subgenomes have been observed in each chromosome, followed by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in most chromosomes in nine chromosome pairs. In addition to maintaining nearly all gene content and synteny from its parental genomes, S. bayanus has acquired many genes from other yeast species, primarily through the introgression of S. cerevisiae, such as those involved in the maltose metabolism. In addition, the patterns of recombination and LOH suggest an allotetraploid origin of S. bayanus. The gene acquisition and rapid LOH in the hybrid genome probably facilitated its adaption to maltose brewing environments and mitigated the maladaptive effect of hybridization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.