Exploring Machine Learning Strategies in COVID-19 Prognostic Modelling: A Systematic Analysis of Diagnosis, Classification and Outcome Prediction
Najjar, R.; Hossain, M. Z.; Ahmed, K. A.; Hasan, M. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic, which has impacted over 222 countries resulting in incalcu-lable losses, has necessitated innovative solutions via machine learning (ML) to tackle the problem of overburdened healthcare systems. This study consolidates research employing ML models for COVID-19 prognosis, evaluates prevalent models and performance, and provides an overview of suitable models and features while offering recommendations for experimental protocols, reproducibility and integration of ML algorithms in clinical settings. MethodsWe conducted a review following the PRISMA framework, examining ML utilisation for COVID-19 prediction. Five databases were searched for relevant studies up to 24 January 2023, resulting in 1,824 unique articles. Rigorous selection criteria led to 204 included studies. Top-performing features and models were extracted, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) evaluation metric used for performance assessment. ResultsThis systematic review investigated 204 studies on ML models for COVID-19 prognosis across automated diagnosis (18.1%), severity classification (31.9%), and outcome prediction (50%). We identified thirty-four unique features in five categories and twenty-one distinct ML models in six categories. The most prevalent features were chest CT, chest radiographs, and advanced age, while the most frequently employed models were CNN, XGB, and RF. Top-performing models included neural networks (ANN, MLP, DNN), distance-based methods (kNN), ensemble methods (XGB), and regression models (PLS-DA), all exhibiting high AUC values. ConclusionMachine learning models have shown considerable promise in improving COVID-19 diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and outcome prediction. Advancements in ML techniques and their integration with complementary technologies will be essential for expediting decision-making and informing clinical decisions, with long-lasting implications for healthcare systems globally.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 97%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 95%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 96%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 96%
- Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize the Importance of Hematologic Biomarkers in Prognosticating Patients with Suspected Infection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 97%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 97%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 diagnosis prediction by symptoms of tested individuals: a machine learning approach 94%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 94%
- Machine Learning Generalizability Across Healthcare Settings: Insights from multi-site COVID-19 screening 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.