Back

Evaluating public and patient involvement in interventional research - a newly developed checklist (EPPIIC) with application to the COB-MS feasibility trial

Pyne, E.; Joyce, R.; Dwyer, C. P.; Hynes, S. M.

2024-03-18 neurology
10.1101/2024.03.17.24304433 medRxiv
Show abstract

Public and patient involvement (PPI) has been identified as an increasingly desired and, often, required component of trial methodology - leading to higher quality, more accessible and relevant clinical research, alongside increased recruitment, funding success and insight into research impact. However, despite the great variety of frameworks and checklists available for assessing PPI, most are limited with respect to important features (e.g. applicable in specific contexts only, fail to clarify what should be assessed and reported, lack the necessary comprehensiveness or are biased in favour of researcher reporting). Thus, the current research aimed to address such limitations through the development of a new checklist, the EPPIIC, through review, thematic analysis and meta-evaluation in conjunction with PPI engagement. A further aim was to pilot the EPPIIC through its application to and reporting on the COB-MS trial, which utilised PPI throughout the researchs life-cycle. Upon completion of the EPPIIC, three thematic sub-scales emerged: (1) Policy & Practice, (2) Participatory Culture and (3) Influence & Impact. All findings are presented and discussed in light of theory and research. Notably, findings recommend EPPIIC as a useful means of assessing PPI in future trials.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.