Evaluating public and patient involvement in interventional research - a newly developed checklist (EPPIIC) with application to the COB-MS feasibility trial
Pyne, E.; Joyce, R.; Dwyer, C. P.; Hynes, S. M.
Show abstract
Public and patient involvement (PPI) has been identified as an increasingly desired and, often, required component of trial methodology - leading to higher quality, more accessible and relevant clinical research, alongside increased recruitment, funding success and insight into research impact. However, despite the great variety of frameworks and checklists available for assessing PPI, most are limited with respect to important features (e.g. applicable in specific contexts only, fail to clarify what should be assessed and reported, lack the necessary comprehensiveness or are biased in favour of researcher reporting). Thus, the current research aimed to address such limitations through the development of a new checklist, the EPPIIC, through review, thematic analysis and meta-evaluation in conjunction with PPI engagement. A further aim was to pilot the EPPIIC through its application to and reporting on the COB-MS trial, which utilised PPI throughout the researchs life-cycle. Upon completion of the EPPIIC, three thematic sub-scales emerged: (1) Policy & Practice, (2) Participatory Culture and (3) Influence & Impact. All findings are presented and discussed in light of theory and research. Notably, findings recommend EPPIIC as a useful means of assessing PPI in future trials.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Facilitated transition in HIV drug trial closure: a conceptual model for HIV post-trial care 95%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 94%
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 94%
- The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 92%
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Conceptual Approach to Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Cognitive Rehabilitation: A description using the TIDieR-Rehab Framework 92%
- Fear of relapse and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the mediating role of psychological resilience 88%
- Rituximab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 92%
- The IGNITE Trial: Participant Recruitment Lessons Prior to SARS-CoV-2 91%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.