Real-world Nuvaxovid COVID-19 vaccine safety profile after first 100,000 doses in Australia, 2022-2023
Clothier, H. J.; Parker, C.; Mallard, J. H.; Effler, P.; Bloomfield, L.; Carcione, D.; Buttery, J. P.
Show abstract
IntroductionNuvaxovid became available in Australia from February 2022, a year later than the first COVID-19 vaccines were released. It was a much-anticipated alternative vaccine for people that had either suffered an adverse event to-and/or were hesitant to receive-one of the mRNA or adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines. Although safety from clinical trials was reassuring, small trial population size, relatively low administration rates worldwide and limited post-licensure intelligence meant potential rare adverse events were underinformed. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational analysis of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) spontaneously reported to SAFEVAC, the integrated vaccine safety surveillance system used by Victoria and Western Australia, Australia. Reports received from 14 Feb 2022 to 30 June 2023 were analysed by vaccinee demographics, reported reactions and COVID-19 vaccine dose received and compared as reporting rates (RR) per 100,000 doses administered. Results356 AEFI reports were received, following 102,946 Nuvaxovid doses administered. Rates were higher post dose 1 than dose 2 (rate ratio 1.5, p=0.0008); primary series than booster (rate ratio 2.4, p<0.0001); in females than males (rate ratio 1.4, p<0.01), especially those aged 30-49 years (RR=1.6, p=0.002). Serious AEFI included 76 chest pain (RR=73.8), two myocarditis (RR=1.9) and 20 pericarditis (RR=19.4). No cases of Guillain-Barre or thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndromes were reported and no deaths attributable to vaccination. ConclusionThe shared SAFEVAC platform enables pooling of clinically reviewed data across jurisdictions, increasing the safety profile evidence-base of novel vaccines like Nuvaxovid and improving the odds for identification and description of rare events across all vaccines. O_TEXTBOXKey public health messageO_ST_ABSWhat did you want to address in this study and why?C_ST_ABSNuvaxovid is a protein-based vaccine for protection against COVID-19. Nuvaxovid received provisional licensure following clinical trials in which 30,058 participants received at least one dose of Nuvaxovid. Introduced following adenoviral vector and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, some people had been waiting for this vaccine as an alternative to other brands that had risk of blood clots or heart inflammation. We wanted to inform on safety of Nuvaxovid following over 100,000 doses administered in real-world population-wide setting in two Australian states. What have we learnt from this study?Adverse events reported were mostly mild, transient symptoms and no deaths were attributed to Nuvaxovid immunisation. Reporting rate for heart inflammation was similar to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, but more likely to be milder pericarditis than myocarditis. For over 25,000 people Nuvaxovid was their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine received, despite being more than a year since COVID-19 vaccines became available. What are the implications of your findings for public health?This first real-world population-wide evidence of Nuvaxovid vaccine safety provides reassurance on the risk-benefit of vaccination for protection from severe COVID-19 disease. We must continue to look hard, using real-world data, to not only ensure vaccines are safe, but also support confidence in immunisation. C_TEXTBOX
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody Response after Second-dose of ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield™ ® ) and BBV-152 (Covaxin™ ® ) among Health Care Workers in India: Final Results of Cross-sectional Coronavirus Vaccine-induced Antibody Titre (COVAT) study 96%
- A randomized clinical trial of a booster dose with low versus standard dose of AZD1222 in adult after 2 doses of inactivated vaccines 95%
- Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Biological E’s CORBEVAX™ vaccine in children and adolescents: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Phase-2/3 Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 96%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster of protein subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 after two doses of adenoviral vector vaccine AZD1222 96%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myocarditis After mRNA-1273 Vaccination: A Population-Based Analysis of 151 Million Vaccine Recipients Worldwide 95%
- Immunogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 & Omicron variant in adults who received two doses of inactivated vaccine 95%
- Hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 during the Omicron wave in Israel - benefits of a fourth vaccine dose 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273 98%
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 96%
- Correlation of post-vaccination fever with specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 booster and no significant influence of antipyretic medication 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 95%
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 95%
- Immune response induced by the Recombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (Adenovirus Type 5 Vector) (Ad5-nCoV) in persons living with HIV (PLWH) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.