Back

GNN codon adjacency regulates protein translation

Sun, J.; Hwang, P.; Sakkas, E. D.; Zhou, Y.; Perez, L.; Dave, I.; Kwon, J. B.; McMahon, A. E.; Wichman, M.; Raval, M.; Scopino, K.; Krizanc, D.; Thayer, K. M.; Weir, M. P.

2024-03-16 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.03.16.583757 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The central dogma treats the ribosome as a molecular machine that reads one mRNA codon at a time as it adds each amino acid to its growing peptide chain. However, this and previous studies suggest that ribosomes actually perceive pairs of adjacent codons as they take three-nucleotide steps along the mRNA. We examined GNN codons which we find are surprisingly overrepresented in eukaryote protein-coding open reading frames (ORFs), especially immediately after NNU codons. Ribosome profiling experiments in yeast revealed that ribosomes with NNU at their aminoacyl (A) site have particularly elevated densities when NNU is immediately followed (3) by a GNN codon, indicating slower mRNA threading of the NNU codon from the ribosomes A to peptidyl (P) sites. Moreover, if the assessment was limited to ribosomes that have only recently arrived at the next codon, by examining 21-nucleotide ribosome footprints (21-nt RFPs), elevated densities were observed for multiple codon classes when followed by GNN. This striking translation slowdown at adjacent 5-NNN GNN codon pairs is likely mediated in part by the ribosomes CAR surface which acts as an extension of the A-site tRNA anticodon during ribosome translocation and interacts through hydrogen bonding and pi stacking with the GNN codon. The functional consequences of 5-NNN GNN codon adjacency are expected to influence the evolution of protein coding sequences. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=78 SRC="FIGDIR/small/583757v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (13K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d29087org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e8f7dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ee5792org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b750fb_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical abstract C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.0%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
RNA
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
7
FEBS Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
10
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.3%
14
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
18
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.0%
20
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%