Back

Erosion of X-Chromosome Inactivation in female hiPSCs is heterogeneous and persists during differentiation

Raposo, A. C.; Caldas, P.; Arez, M.; Jeremias, J.; Barbosa, P.; Sousa-Luis, R.; Agua, F. D.; Oxley, D.; Mupo, A. M.; Eckersley-Maslin, M.; Casanova, M.; Grosso, A. R.; da Rocha, S. T.

2024-03-15 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.03.15.585169 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During culture, female human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), including human induced PSCs (hiPSCs) exhibit a propensity for erosion of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). This phenomenon is characterized by the loss of XIST RNA expression and reactivation of a subset of X-linked genes from the inactive X chromosome (Xi). XCI erosion, despite its common occurrence, is often overlooked by the stem cell community, hindering a complete understanding of its impact on both fundamental and translational applications of hiPSCs. Investigating erosion dynamics in female hiPSCs, our study reveals that XCI erosion is a frequent yet heterogeneous phenomenon, resulting in the reactivation of several X-linked genes. The likelihood of a gene to erode increases for those located on the short arm of the X chromosome and within H3K27me3-enriched domains. Paradoxically, genes that typically escape XCI are hypersensitive to loss of XIST RNA and XCI erosion. This implies that XIST RNA normally restrains expression levels of these genes on the Xi. Importantly, increased X-linked gene expression upon erosion does not globally impact (hydroxy)methylation levels in hiPSCs or at imprinted regions. By exploring diverse differentiation paradigms, such as trilineage commitment and cardiac differentiation, our study reveals the persistence of abnormal XCI patterns throughout differentiation. This finding has significant implications for fundamental research, translational applications, and clinical use of stem cells. We underscore the importance of raising awareness within the stem cell community regarding XCI erosion and advocate for its inclusion in comprehensive hiPSC quality control.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
7
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.8%
10
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
13
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
16
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
18
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
22
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%