Back

Correspondence of fentanyl brain pharmacokinetics and behavior measured via engineering opioids biosensors and computational ethology

Muthusamy, A. K.; Rosenberg, M.; Kim, C. H.; Wang, A. Z.; Ebisu, H.; Chin, T. M.; Koranne, A.; Marvin, J. S.; Cohen, B. N.; Looger, L. L.; Oka, Y.; Meister, M.; Lester, H. A.

2024-03-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.03.15.584894 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the ongoing epidemic of opioid use disorder and death by fentanyl overdose, opioids remain the gold standard for analgesics. Pharmacokinetics (PK) dictates the individuals experience and utility of drugs; however, PK and behavioral outcomes have been conventionally studied in separate groups, even in preclinical models. To bridge this gap, we developed the first class of sensitive, selective, and genetically encodable fluorescent opioid biosensors, iOpioidSnFRs, including the fentanyl sensor, iFentanylSnFR. We expressed iFentanylSnFR in the ventral tegmental area of mice and recorded [fentanyl] alongside videos of behaviors before and after administration. We developed a machine vision routine to quantify the effects of the behavior on locomotor activity. We found that mice receiving fentanyl exhibited a repetitive locomotor pattern that paralleled the [fentanyl] time course. In a separate experiment, mice navigating a complex maze for water showed a dose-dependent impairment in navigation, in which animals repeated incorrect paths to the exclusion of most of the unexplored maze for the duration of the average fentanyl time course. This approach complements classical operant conditioning experiments and introduces a key feature of human addiction, the ability to carry out an ethologically relevant survival task, only now quantified in rodents. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of iFentanylSnFR in detecting fentanyl spiked into human biofluids and the generalizability of engineering methods to evolve selective biosensors of other opioids, such as tapentadol and levorphanol. These results encourage diagnostic and continuous monitoring approaches to personalizing opioid regimens for humans.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.7%
4
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
10
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
17
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
22
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
24
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%