Back

Experimental evolution of an RNA virus in Caenorhabditis elegans

Castiglioni, V. G.; Olmo-Uceda, M. J.; Martin, S.; Felix, M. A.; Gonzalez, R.; Elena, S. F.

2024-03-14 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.03.14.584948 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The discovery of Orsay virus (OrV), the first virus infecting wild populations of Caenorhabditis elegans, has boosted studies of viral immunity pathways in this nematode. Considering the many advantages that C. elegans offers for fundamental research in host-pathogen interactions, this pathosystem has high potential to become a model system for experimental virus evolution studies. However, the evolutionary constraints operating in this pathosystem have barely been explored. Here we describe for the first time an evolution experiment of two different OrV strains in C. elegans. After 10 serial passages of evolution, we report slight changes in infectivity and non-synonymous mutations fixed in the evolved viral populations. In addition, we observed numerous minor variants emerging in the viral population. These minor variants were not randomly distributed along the genome but concentrated in polymorphic genomic regions. Overall, our work established the grounds for future experimental virus evolution studies using Caenorhabditis nematodes. HIGHLIGHTSO_LICaenorhabditis elegans-Orsay virus is a convenient pathosystem to study virus evolution. C_LIO_LIThe approach used to test the viral strains may interfere with the infection phenotypes observed. C_LIO_LIThere may be specific genomic hotspots regions of nucleotide diversity important for the evolution of Orsay virus. C_LIO_LIThe substitution rate observed for Orsay virus was low, suggesting that the two strains studied might be already well adapted to laboratory conditions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.