Back

Searching the Pinus taeda foliar mycobiome for emerging pathogens among brown spot needle blight and needlecast outbreaks in the Southeast United States

Meinecke, C. D.; Niyas, A. M. M.; McCarty, E.; Quesada, T.; Smith, J. A.; Villari, C.

2024-03-13 microbiology
10.1101/2024.03.13.584907 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Needle pathogens cause the discoloration, death, or premature abscission of conifer foliage, which reduce growth and vigor, and repeated defoliation may eventually result in tree mortality. Since 2016, forest managers in the southeast United States have reported an increasing scale, frequency, and severity of needle disease outbreaks on the regions principal timber species, loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). These recent outbreaks are raising concern throughout the region, as needle diseases are not traditionally considered a threat to P. taeda. Lecanosticta acicola (Thum.) Syd., the native causal agent of brown-spot needle blight, has been recovered from some outbreaks, however, the full array of fungi associated with symptoms has not been explored. In this research, P. taeda foliage was collected from affected stands throughout the region and analyzed to identify fungi associated with needle disease symptoms. We employed both targeted molecular diagnostics, to confirm the presence or absence of L. acicola, and DNA metabarcoding, to characterize the foliar mycobiome and screen for other potential pathogens. Lecanosticta acicola was detected among symptomatic needles from multiple states, particularly in western portions of the P. taeda range but rarely from stands in eastern states. Fungal ITS1 metabarcoding revealed multiple pathogens in symptomatic needles and identified associations between known pathogens fungi and differing symptoms. Additionally, the fungal community composition of needles varied with patterns of symptom presentation. This study is the first regionwide assessment of fungi associated with recent large-scale needle disease outbreaks on P. taeda and identifies multiple pathogens that warrant study in greater detail.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
3
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
11
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
15
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
18
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
20
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%
24
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%