Scalable design of repeat protein structural dynamics via probabilistic coarse-grained models
Sarvaharman, S.; Neary, T. E.; Gorochowski, T. E.; Parmeggiani, F.
Show abstract
Computational protein design has emerged as a powerful tool for creating proteins with novel functionalities. However, most existing methods ignore structural dynamics even though they are known to play a central role in many protein functions. Furthermore, methods like molecular dynamics that are able to simulate protein movements are computationally demanding and do not scale for the design of even moderately sized proteins. Here, we develop a probabilistic coarse-grained model to overcome these limitations and support the design of the structural dynamics of modular repeat proteins. Our model allows us to rapidly calculate the probability distribution of structural conformations of large modular proteins, enabling efficient screening of design candidates based on features of their dynamics. We demonstrate this capability by exploring the design landscape of 4-6 module repeat proteins. We assess the flexibility, curvature and multi-state potential of over 65,000 protein variants and identify the roles that particular modules play in controlling these features. Although our focus here is on protein design, the methods developed are easily generalised to any modular structure (e.g., DNA origami), offering a means to incorporate dynamics into diverse biological design workflows.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intrinsically disordered protein ensembles shape evolutionary rates revealing conformational patterns 95%
- Robust prediction of relative binding energies for protein-protein complex mutations using free energy perturbation calculations 94%
- Assembly of Protein Complexes In and On the Membrane with Predicted Spatial Arrangement Constraints 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.