Fruit-In-Sight: a deep learning-based framework for secondary metabolite class prediction using fruit and leaf images
Krishnan, N. M.; Kumar, S.; Panda, B.
Show abstract
Fruits produce a wide variety of secondary metabolites of great economic value. Analytical measurement of secondary metabolites is tedious, time-consuming and expensive. Additionally, metabolite concentration varies greatly from tree to tree, making it difficult to choose trees for fruit collection. The current study tested whether deep learning-based models can be developed using fruit and leaf images alone to predict a metabolites concentration class (high or low). We collected fruits and leaves (n = 1045) from neem trees grown in the wild across 0.6 million sq km, imaged those, measured concentration of five metabolites (azadirachtin, deacetyl-salannin, salannin, nimbin and nimbolide) using high-performance liquid chromatography and used those to train deep learning models for metabolite class prediction. The best model out of the seven tested (YOLOv5, GoogLeNet, InceptionNet, EfficientNet_B0, Resnext_50, Resnet18, and SqueezeNet) provided a validation F1 score of 0.93 and a test F1 score of 0.88. The sensitivity and specificity of the fruit model alone in the test set were 83.52 {+/-} 6.19 and 82.35 {+/-} 5.96 and 79.40 {+/-} 8.50 and 85.64 {+/-} 6.21, for the low and the high class, respectively. The sensitivity was further boosted to 92.67{+/-} 5.25 for the low class and 88.11 {+/-} 9.17 for the high class and the specificity to 100% for both classes, using a multi-analyte framework. We incorporated the model in an Android mobile App Fruit-In-Sight that uses fruit and leaf images to decide whether to pick or not pick the fruits from a specific tree based on the metabolite concentration class. Our study provides evidence that images of fruits and leaves alone can predict the concentration class of a secondary metabolite without using extensive analytical laboratory procedures and equipment and makes the process of choosing the right tree for fruit collection easy and free of equipment and additional cost.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully unsupervised deep mode of action learning for phenotyping high-content cellular images 93%
- Prediction of bacterial protein-compound interactions with only positive samples 93%
- Improving Deconvolution Methods in Biology through Open Innovation Competitions: An Application to the Connectivity Map 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SpheroScan: A User-Friendly Deep Learning Tool for Spheroid Image Analysis 94%
- ChronoRoot: High-throughput phenotyping by deep segmentation networks reveals novel temporal parameters of plant root system architecture 93%
- ShinyLearner: A containerized benchmarking tool for machine-learning classification of tabular data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Label-free prediction of Cell Painting from brightfield images 94%
- Annotation-free Learning of Plankton for Classification and Anomaly Detection 93%
- DeepInsight-3D for precision oncology: an improved anti-cancer drug response prediction from high-dimensional multi-omics data with convolutional neural networks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology 93%
- A variational autoencoder trained with priors from canonical pathways increases the interpretability of transcriptome data 92%
- Beam search decoder for enhancing sequence decoding speed in single-molecule peptide sequencing data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.