Back

Towards an Eye-Brain-Computer Interface: Combining Gaze with the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity for Target Selections in XR

Reddy, G. S. R.; Proulx, M. J.; Hirshfield, L.; Ries, A. J.

2024-03-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.03.13.584609 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gaze-assisted interaction techniques enable intuitive selections without requiring manual pointing but can result in unintended selections, known as Midas touch. A confirmation trigger eliminates this issue but requires additional physical and conscious user effort. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly passive BCIs harnessing anticipatory potentials such as the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity (SPN) - evoked when users anticipate a forthcoming stimulus - present an effortless implicit solution for selection confirmation. Within a VR context, our research uniquely demonstrates that SPN has the potential to decode intent towards the visually focused target. We reinforce the scientific understanding of its mechanism by addressing a confounding factor - we demonstrate that the SPN is driven by the users intent to select the target, not by the stimulus feedback itself. Furthermore, we examine the effect of familiarly placed targets, finding that SPN may be evoked quicker as users acclimatize to target locations; a key insight for everyday BCIs. CCS CONCEPTSO_LIHuman-centered computing [->] Virtual reality; Mixed / augmented reality; Accessibility technologies; Interaction techniques. C_LI ACM Reference FormatG. S. Rajshekar Reddy, Michael J. Proulx, Leanne Hirshfield, and Anthony J. Ries. 2024. Towards an Eye-Brain-Computer Interface: Combining Gaze with the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity for Target Selections in XR. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 24), May 11-16, 2024, Honolulu, HI, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3641925

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.