Back

Steppe Ancestry in western Eurasia and the spread of the Germanic Languages

McColl, H.; Kroonen, G.; Moreno-Mayar, J. V.; Valeur Seersholm, F.; Scorrano, G.; Pinotti, T.; Vimala, T.; Sindbaek, S. M.; Ethelberg, P.; Fyfe, R.; Gaillard, M.-J.; Larsen, H. M. E.; Mortensen, M. F.; Demeter, F.; Jorkov, M. L. S.; Bergerbrant, S.; Damgaard, P. d. B.; Allentoft, M. E.; Vinner, L.; Gaunitz, C.; Ramsoe, A.; Altinkaya, I.; Amund Henriksen, R.; Irving-Pease, E. K.; Sabatini, S.; Fischer, A.; Barrie, W.; Ingason, A.; Rosengren, A.; Vaughn, A.; Cao, J.; Staring, J.; Stenderup, J.; Yediay, F. E.; Ahlstrom, T.; Albris, S. L.; Atabiev, B.; Bangsgaard, P.; Belcastro, M. G.; Card, N.; C

2024-03-14 genetics
10.1101/2024.03.13.584607 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Today, Germanic languages, including German, English, Frisian, Dutch and the Nordic languages, are widely spoken in northwest Europe. However, key aspects of the assumed arrival and diversification of this linguistic group remain contentious1-3. By adding 712 new ancient human genomes we find an archaeologically elusive population entering Sweden from the Baltic region by around 4000 BP. This population became widespread throughout Scandinavia by 3500 BP, matching the contemporaneous distribution of Palaeo-Germanic, the Bronze Age predecessor of Proto-Germanic4-6. These Baltic immigrants thus offer a new potential vector for the first Germanic speakers to arrive in Scandinavia, some 800 years later than traditionally assumed7-12. Following the disintegration of Proto-Germanic13-16, we find by 1650 BP a southward push from Southern Scandinavia into presumed Celtic-speaking areas, including Germany, Poland and the Netherlands. During the Migration Period (1575-1375 BP), we see this ancestry representing West Germanic Anglo-Saxons in Britain, and Langobards in southern Europe. We find a related large-scale northward migration into Denmark and South Sweden corresponding with historically attested Danes and the expansion of Old Norse. These movements have direct implications for multiple linguistic hypotheses. Our findings show the power of combining genomics with historical linguistics and archaeology in creating a unified, integrated model for the emergence, spread and diversification of a linguistic group.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.