Socio-Economic Factors Associated with Cancer Stigma among Apparently Healthy Women in Semi-urban Nepal.
Paneru, B.; Karmacharya, A.; Makaju, S.; Kafle, D.; Poudel, L.; Mali, S.; Timsina, P.; Shrestha, N.; Timalsena, D.; Chaudhary, K.; Bhandari, N.; Rai, P.; Shakya, S.; Spiegelman, D.; Sheth, S. S.; Stangl, A.; Eastment, M. C.; Shrestha, A.
Show abstract
Cancer is the primary cause of death globally, and despite the significant advancements in treatment and survival rates, it is still stigmatized in many parts of the world. However, there is limited public health research on cancer stigma among general population (non-patient) women in Nepal. Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence of cancer stigma and its associated factors in this group. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among 426 healthy women aged 30 - 60 years who were residents of Dhulikhel and Banepa in central Nepal. We measured cancer stigma using the Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS). CASS measures cancer stigma in six subdomains (awkwardness, avoidance, severity, personal responsibility, policy opposition, financial discrimination) on a 6-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to agree strongly) with higher mean stigma scores correlating with higher levels of stigma. We used univariable and multivariable linear regression to identify the socio-demographic factors associated with the CASS score. ResultsOverall, the level of cancer stigma was low (mean total stigma score: 2.6 {+/-} 0.6) but still present among participants. Stigma related to personal responsibility had the highest levels (mean stigma score: 3.9 {+/-} 1.3), followed by severity (mean stigma score: 3.2 {+/-} 1.3) and financial discrimination (mean stigma score: 2.9 {+/-} 1.6). There was a significant association of mean CASS score with older age (the mean difference is stigma score: 0.01 points; 95% CI: 0.01-0.02) and lower education (difference -0.02 points; 95% CI: -0.03, -0.003) after adjusting for age, ethnicity, education, marital status, religion, occupation, and parity. ConclusionWhile overall cancer stigma was low in Nepal, some subdomains were increased in the general population of women in Nepal. Because stigma may impact engagement in cancer screening efforts, programs should aim to counteract stigma, particularly among older and less educated women.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Projected Cancer Burden, Challenges, and Barriers to Cancer Prevention and Control Activities in the State of Telangana 95%
- Experiences of cervical cancer survivors in Chitwan, Nepal: a qualitative study 94%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical candidacy and treatment uptake among women with cervical cancer at public referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda 94%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 94%
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uptake and factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women aged 18-49 years at a public hospital in Coastal Kenya 94%
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 92%
- Organizational models and patient-reported outcomes for palliative care across five tertiary hospitals in Nigeria: an Environmental Scan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 93%
- Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy: Considerations from an OBGYN Perspective 91%
- Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial toxicity among cancer patients, survivors, and their families in the United Kingdom: a scoping review 93%
- Challenges to self-isolation among contacts of cases of COVID-19: a national telephone survey in Wales 92%
- Social relationships and activities following elimination of SARS-CoV-2: a qualitative cross-sectional study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.