Development and Validation of an Asthma Policy Model for Canada:Lifetime Exposures and Asthma outcomes Projection (LEAP)
Lee, T. Y.; Petkau, J.; Johnson, K. M.; Turvey, S.; Adibi, A.; Subbarao, P.; Sadatsafavi, M.
Show abstract
PurposeTo develop Lifetime Exposures and Asthma outcomes Projection (LEAP), a reference policy model for evaluating health outcomes and costs of asthma interventions and policies for the Canadian population. MethodsFollowing the best practice guidelines for development, we first created a conceptual map with a steering committee of clinician experts and economic modelers through a modified Delphi-process. Following the committees recommendations and given the multidimensionality of risk factors and the need for modeling realistic aspects (e.g., gradual market penetration) of adopting health technologies, we opted for an open-population microsimulation design. For the first version of the model, we concentrated on several key risk factors (age, sex, family history of asthma at birth, and exposure to antibiotics in the first year of life) from the concept map. The model consists of five intertwined modules: 1) demographic, 2) risk factors, 3) asthma occurrence, 4) asthma outcomes, and 5) payoffs. The demographic module, including birth, mortality, immigration, and emigration, was based on sex- and age-specific estimates and projections from Statistics Canada. The distributions of risk factors, including family history of asthma and exposure to antibiotics, were estimated from population-based administrative databases and a population-based longitudinal birth cohort. To estimate parameters in the asthma occurrence (prevalence, incidence, reassessment) and asthma outcomes (severity, symptom control, exacerbations) modules, we performed quantitative evidence synthesis. Costs and utility weights were obtained from the literature. We conducted multiple face and internal validation assessments. ResultsLEAP is capable of modeling asthma-related health outcomes at the individual and aggregate levels from 2001 onwards. Face validity was confirmed by checking the structure, equations, codes, and results. We calibrated and internally validated the age-sex stratified demographic projections to the estimates and projections from Statistics Canada, the age-sex stratified asthma prevalence to the administrative data, and the asthma control levels and exacerbation rates to the estimates from the literature. ConclusionsLEAP is the first reference Canadian asthma policy model that emerged from identified needs for health policy planning for early interventions in asthma. As an open-source and open-access platform, LEAP can provide a unified framework under which different interventions and policies can be consistently compared to identify those with the highest value proposition. FundingThis study was funded by a research grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Genome Canada (274CHI). The funders had no role in any aspect of this study and were not aware of the results. EthicsThis study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver (H22-00571).
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for asthma among schoolchildren who participated in a case-control study in urban Uganda 90%
- Revealing the drivers of antibiotic resistance trends in Streptococcus pneumoniae amidst the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from mathematical modeling 90%
- A modular approach to integrating multiple data sources into real-time clinical prediction for pediatric diarrhea 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of widespread respirator use in curtailing COVID-19 transmission in the United States 89%
- School and community reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mathematical modeling study 89%
- Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does the occurrence of a severe asthma exacerbation change the rate of subsequent events? 93%
- Long-term exposure to air pollution and risk of adult-onset asthma and COPD: Danish nationwide cohort study 87%
- Multiple breath-washout for pulmonary function assessment in young childhood cancer survivors: a multicenter study 86%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.