Back

Blinatumomab Trimer Formation: Insights From A Mechanistic PKPD Model Into The Implications For Switching From Infusion To Subcutaneous Dosing Regimen

Kapitanov, G. I.; Head, S. A.; Flowers, D.; Apgar, J. F.; Grant, J.

2024-03-13 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.03.11.24304117
Show abstract

Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) that binds to CD3 on T cells and CD19 on B cells. It has been approved for use in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with a regimen that requires continuous infusion (cIV) for four weeks per treatment cycle. It is currently in clinical trials for Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with cIV administration. Recently, there have been studies investigating dose-response after subcutaneous (SC) dosing in B-ALL and in NHL to determine whether this more convenient method of delivery would have a similar efficacy/safety profile as continuous infusion. We constructed mechanistic PKPD models of blinatumomab activity in B-ALL and NHL patients, investigating the amount of CD3:blinatumomab:CD19 trimers the drug forms at different dosing administrations and regimens. The modeling and analysis demonstrate that the explored SC doses in B-ALL and NHL achieve similar trimer numbers as the cIV doses in those indications. We further simulated various subcutaneous dosing regimens, and identified conditions where trimer formation dynamics are similar between constant infusion and subcutaneous dosing. Based on the model results, subcutaneous dosing is a viable and convenient strategy for blinatumomab and is projected to result in similar trimer numbers as constant infusion.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
based on 19 papers
Top 0.3%
11.4%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 6%
11.4%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 22%
7.7%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 57%
7.7%
5
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 2%
7.7%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
4.6%
8
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
based on 17 papers
Top 0.3%
2.9%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
12
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
13
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Emerging Microbes & Infections
based on 20 papers
Top 1.0%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
16
Journal of Theoretical Biology
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
17
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Immunology
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 13%
0.8%
24
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
28
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%