Sex-specific viability effects of mutations in Drosophila melanogaster
Melde, R. H.; Abraham, J. M.; Ugolini, M. R.; Castle, M. P.; Fjalstad, M. M.; Blumstein, D. M.; Sharp, N. P.
Show abstract
In populations with separate sexes, genetic load due to deleterious mutations may be expressed differently in males and females. Evidence from insect models suggests that selection against mutations is stronger in males, with a positive intersexual correlation for fitness. This pattern will reduce deleterious allele frequencies at the expense of males, such that female mean fitness is greater than expected, preserving population persistence in the face of high mutation rates. While previous studies focus on reproductive success, mutation load depends on total selection in each sex, including selection for viability. In fruit flies, we might expect minimal sex differences in viability effects, since male and female larvae behave similarly, but many genes show sex-biased expression in larvae. We measured the sex-specific viability effects of nine "marker" mutations and 33 mutagenized chromosomes. We find that both types of mutations generally reduce viability in both sexes. Among marker mutations we detect instances of sex biased selection in both directions, but mutagenized chromosomes show little sign of sex-specific mutational variance. We conclude that some mutations can indeed affect viability in a sex-specific manner, but that the pattern of male-biased mutational effects observed previously for reproductive success is not apparent at the pre-reproductive stage.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Minimal effects of proto-Y chromosomes on house fly gene expression in spite of evidence that selection maintains stable polygenic sex determination 96%
- Blm Helicase Facilitates Rapid Replication of Repetitive DNA Sequences in early Drosophila Development 96%
- Complexities of recapitulating polygenic effects in natural populations: replication of genetic effects on wing shape in artificially selected and wild caught populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feminisation of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster via female-limited X chromosome evolution 97%
- Sexually discordant selection is associated with trait specific morphological changes and a complex genomic response 95%
- Testing the adaptive value of sporulation in budding yeast using experimental evolution 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hoisted with his own petard: how sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila affinis creates resistance alleles that limit its spread 96%
- Genotype x Environment interaction and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: adult nutritional environment mediates selection and expression of sex-specific genetic variance in D. melanogaster 95%
- Costs and benefits of giant sperm and sperm storage organs in Drosophila melanogaster 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sexual selection does not increase the rate of compensatory adaptation to a mutation influencing a secondary sexual trait in Drosophila melanogaster 97%
- The genetics of male pheromone preference difference between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans 96%
- The genetic basis of Drosophila melanogaster defense against Beauveria bassiana explored through evolve and resequence and quantitative trait locus mapping 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.