Low-intensity focused ultrasound to the human insular cortex differentially modulates the heartbeat-evoked potential: a proof-of-concept study
Strohman, A.; Payne, B.; Isaac, G.; Verdonk, C.; Khalsa, S. S.; Legon, W.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) is a brain response time-locked to the heartbeat and a potential marker of interoceptive processing. The insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) are brain regions that may be involved in generating the HEP. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that can selectively target sub-regions of the insula and dACC to better understand their contributions to the HEP. ObjectiveProof-of-concept study to determine whether LIFU modulation of the anterior insula (AI), posterior insula (PI), and dACC influences the HEP. MethodsIn a within-subject, repeated-measures design, healthy human participants (n=16) received 10 minutes of stereotaxically targeted LIFU to the AI, PI, dACC or Sham at rest during continuous electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) recording on separate days. Primary outcome was change in HEP amplitudes. Relationships between LIFU pressure and HEP changes were examined using linear mixed modelling. Peripheral indices of visceromotor output including heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) were explored between conditions. ResultsRelative to sham, LIFU to the PI, but not AI or dACC, decreased HEP amplitudes; this was partially explained by increased LIFU pressure. LIFU did not affect time or frequency dependent measures of HRV. ConclusionsThese results demonstrate the ability to modulate HEP amplitudes via non-invasive targeting of key interoceptive brain regions. Our findings have implications for the causal role of these areas in bottom-up heart-brain communication that could guide future work investigating the HEP as a marker of interoceptive processing in healthy and clinical populations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial ultrasound stimulation in humans is associated with an auditory confound that can be effectively masked 96%
- Cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of cervical vagus vs. auricular nerve: a comparative, parametric study in nonhuman primates 96%
- Enhancement of Temporal Processing via Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 97%
- Characterization of spatiotemporal dynamics of binary and graded tonic pain in humans using intracranial recordings 95%
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling mouse auditory response dynamics along a continuum of consciousness using a deep recurrent neural network 95%
- Xenon and nitrous oxide induced changes in resting EEG activity can be explained by systematic increases in the relaxation rates of stochastically driven alpha band oscillatory activity 94%
- Probing the circuits of conscious perception with magnetophosphenes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex 95%
- Changes in cross-frequency coupling following closed-loop auditory stimulation in non-rapid eye movement sleep 95%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stimulation Artifact Source Separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) 95%
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 95%
- Heartbeat and Somatosensory Perception 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.