Back

Factors associated with the uptake of early antenatal care visits among pregnant women in Zambia: 2007-2019

Ng'ambi, W. F.; Zyambo, C.; Hazemba, A. N.; Muula, A. S.; Nkhoma, D.; Hamonga, T.; Mwiche, A.

2024-03-09 health policy
10.1101/2024.03.08.24303972 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONThe timing of antenatal care (ANC) attendance may affect outcomes for mother and child health. Using the Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS), we describe the adoption of at least four early ANC (ANC4+) visits and early uptake of ANC among women of reproductive age in Zambia between 2007 and 2019. METHODSWe made use of ZDHS data gathered between 2007 and 2019. In this investigation, all women between the ages of 15 and 49 were taken into account. Early ANC4+ was the desired result, which was defined as having at least four ANC visits with the first ANC visit occurring during the first four months of pregnancy. In Stata v17, weighted univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTSA total of 11633 (56%) of the 20661 women enrolled in our study had received early initiation of ANC4+. We saw an increase in the proportion of women who started ANC4+ early, from 55% in 2007 to 63% in 2018/19. There was a decreasing trend in the odds of early ANC4+ initiation with parity, but an increasing trend in the odds of early ANC4+ initiation with a higher level of education. Being a member of a wealthier household was associated with a lower risk of ANC4+ (OR= 0.81, 95%CI: 0.66-0.99, P=0.03). Twenty-seven percent of the 12,333 women who had at least four ANC visits, regardless of the timing of their first visit, reported being late for ANC. CONCLUSIONEarly ANC4+ uptake increased in Zambia between 2007 and 2019. There were, however, disparities due to wealth, education, and parity. We found that 27% of women who were misclassified as having at least ANC4+ using conventional analysis were actually late for ANC. We provide some key considerations for ensuring that Zambia and other similar settings achieve universal antenatal care coverage by 2030.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
17.5%
3
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%