Back

Scalable Isolation of Surface-Engineered Extracellular Vesicles and Separation of Free Proteins via Tangential Flow Filtration and Size Exclusion Chromatography (TFF-SEC)

Kawai-Harada, Y.; Nimmagadda, V.; Harada, M.

2024-03-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.03.07.584007 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExtracellular vesicles (EVs) represent small lipid bilayer structures pivotal in mediating intercellular communication via biomolecular transfer. Their inherent characteristics, including packaging, non-immunogenicity, and biofluid stability, position EVs as promising drug delivery vectors. However, developing clinical quality EVs requires multifaceted technological advancement. MethodsIn this study, a method is introduced for engineering extracellular vesicles (eEVs) from cultured cells and their subsequent isolation using lab-scale tangential flow filtration (TFF). This is the first study to evaluate DNA loading efficacy into EVs isolated by TFF, marking a significant milestone in the field of targeted drug delivery. Initially, cells are transfected with EV-display constructs to facilitate the secretion of eEVs bearing the desired coding molecules. Following brief centrifugation, the cell culture media undergoes filtration using hollow fiber filters. TFF, by applying a constant flow, effectively segregates molecules based on designated molecular weight cut-off (MWCO), enriching particles between 50 nm and 650 nm. ResultsCompared to conventional methods like ultracentrifugation, TFF demonstrates higher efficiency in removing undesired molecules/aggregates while exerting less stress on EVs. Characterization of eEVs through various assays confirms TFFs superiority in isolating pure EV populations. Additionally, the necessity of size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) after tangential flow filtration (TFF) becomes evident for effectively removing unbound protein contaminants. ConclusionIn conclusion, TFF-SEC emerges as a scalable and superior approach for eEV isolation, promising significant advancements in clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.