Rapid Point-Of-Care Detection Of SARS-COV-2 By Alveo Be.Well Platform: Analytical And Clinical Evaluations
Fang, R.; Coleman, S.; Kwok, C.; Heisser, H.; Wang, T.; Kim, L. J.; Coopersmith, A.; Crawford, D.; Ha, K.; Gaiteri, J. C.; Chiang, Y.-M.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDThe pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has had a profound global impact on human health and the economy. Early diagnosis and prompt effective treatment can reduce disease spread. At present, the majority of high-accuracy diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are conducted in specialized laboratories and rely on conventional quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. This diagnostic approach presents several challenges, including prolonged turnaround times and high costs due to the time and technical skills required to administer test protocols. Our primary aim is to develop a diagnostic platform suitable for use entirely within the point-of-care setting, avoiding the time and resource requirements of standard PCR test processing conducted away from the point-of-care. METHODS AND FINDINGSWe developed the Alveo be.well COVID-19 Test as a diagnostic tool for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in upper respiratory specimens. This innovative test detects viral RNA from SARS-CoV-2 within an unprocessed nasal specimen through the application of reverse transcription-loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and electrical impedance measurement. The LAMP test primers are specifically designed to amplify a conserved region in the nucleocapsid gene of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, ensuring detection accuracy. To enhance usability and shelf life at ambient temperature, the primers are embedded within a microfluidic cartridge, along with other required reagents for viral target amplification. This test is designed for point-of-care settings, offering a straightforward and user-friendly process. The test includes: nasal swab sample collection; elution of the sample in a buffer; transfer of the eluted sample into the cartridge; insertion of the cartridge into an analyzer for amplification, and real-time result interpretation. All processing steps, including heating, mixing, amplification, and detection, occur within the cartridge during the test run, making it particularly user-friendly and obviating the need for significant user training. Results are displayed on a mobile smart device within approximately 50 minutes, via the be.well app, facilitating real-time decision-making in the point-of-care environment. Test and result data is also transferred to and stored in the cloud. To evaluate the analytical performance of this platform, we initially assessed the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the Alveo be.well COVID-19 test. We also evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Alveo be.well COVID-19 assay using contrived reference samples. Furthermore, we validated the clinical performance of the Alveo be.well COVID-19 test in different clinical settings in both USA and United Kingdom during the pandemic seasons in 2020 through 2022. Test results from 253 nasal swab samples were compared to a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reference standard. CONCLUSIONSThe development of the Alveo be.well platform for infectious disease testing, including SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, represents a significant advancement in portable diagnostic technology, encompassing both nucleic acid amplification and detection technologies. In testing SARS-CoV-2, the system amplifies the nucleic acid target within unprocessed nasal specimens using RT-LAMP chemistry, while concurrently measuring the electrical impedance signal produced during target amplification process, delivering results in under an hour. The system exhibits high analytical specificity and sensitivity, with a limit of detection of as low as 4000 viral genomic copies per milliliter, making it highly effective for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 target. Results derived from clinical validation studies showed 93% sensitivity and 95% specificity when compared to RT-qPCR. This system was demonstrated to be a user-friendly and rapid diagnostic platform with high analytical and clinical specificity and sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection with the potential to facilitate early, fast diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 to help contain the spread of the disease, particularly in point-of-care settings.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Recommendations for sample pooling on the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) system using the Cepheid Xpert(R) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay 96%
- Multicenter international assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP test for point of care clinical application 96%
- An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an open-source, extraction-less “direct” RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 96%
- Evaluation of a fully automated high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 multiplex qPCR assay with build-in screening functionality for DelHV69/70- and N501Y variants such as B.1.1.7 95%
- CRISPR-cas13 enzymology rapidly detects SARS-CoV-2 fragments in a clinical setting 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 97%
- Real-time RT-PCR Allelic Discrimination Assay for Detection of N501Y Mutation in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Variants of Concern 96%
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Verification of the Abbott Alinity m Resp-4-Plex Assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus 97%
- Analytical Performance of the AMDI Fast PCR Mini Respiratory Panel 96%
- Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type. 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.