Quorum sensing in Mycobacteria: understanding the recognition machinery conundrum through an in-silico approach
Janakiraman, v.; PHANI SARATH TEJA, K.
Show abstract
Bacteria employ a cell-to-cell communication process called quorum sensing (QS) to orchestrate group behaviors like exo-factors and host-adapted traits. The QS machinery in gram negative bacteria comprises of LuxR proteins (and their homologs) that are transcription factors which recognize and bind to the classical signaling molecules acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs). On the other hand, QS in gram positive bacteria is mediated through autoinducer peptides recognized by two-component systems (TCS). However, in acid-fast bacteria, the very process of QS and the underlying molecular machinery remains elusive. In the present work, we have investigated the proteins annotated as LuxR family proteins of the clinically important genera of the acid-fast bacteria, mycobacteria through computational analysis. We have chosen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the etiological agent of tuberculosis and a most widely used model system for Mycobacterial studies, Mycobacterium smegmatis. A total of 17 genes annotated as LuxR homologs (7 from Mtb and 10 from M. smegmatis) were analyzed. We found that only 14 of these proteins (5 from Mtb and 9 from M. smegmatis) harbor the HTH motif typical to the LuxR/FixJ superfamily of transcriptional regulators affirming their belonging to LuxR family. Rv0894 and MSMEG_0545 both annotated as LuxR homologs, do not harbor HTH motif and RegX (also annotated as LuxR homolog) does not have the tetra helical HTH which is the characteristic of LuxR/FixJ superfamily and hence are not LuxR family proteins. Interestingly, most of the LuxR family proteins (2 in Mtb and 6 in M. smegmatis) are response regulators (RRs) that harbor REC domain that is involved in phosphotransfer from the histidine kinases (HK) thus forming a TCS involved in physiological processes. Few of them have their cognate HKs while few are orphan regulators. The remaining of the proteins harbor various sensory domains that include MalT, PAS, GAF, AcyC, ATPase, TPR, TOMM, and HchA which are either enzymes or bind to small ligand or proteins. STITCH-an online protein-chemical interaction server in deed revealed various small molecules including c-di-GMP (QS molecule in M. smegmatis), and 3-oxo-C12-HSL (a QS signal in P. aeruginosa) binding to the ligand-harboring LuxR proteins. Our study not only confirms the authenticity of Mycobacterial LuxRs but also reveals the diversity of domains in the proteins annotated as LuxR family members in mycobacteria. This type of domain organization is strikingly different from the classical quorum sensing machinery of other bacteria, which might have evolved for a hitherto unknown multifunctionality including QS. IMPORTANCEThough QS is an important biological process regulating various traits in most other bacteria, the workings of it remain elusive in Mycobacteria. Hence, in the present study, we have attempted to unearth the nature of proteins annotated as LuxR family proteins (which participate in quorum sensing in other bacteria) in mycobacteria through in silico analysis. We show that LuxRs of mycobacteria fall into four different families of LuxR/FixJ group of proteins, based on the presence and nature of the sensory domains. Our results provide an understanding of how diverse LuxR proteins could be in terms of domain composition and hence function. This also hints towards the ligands of varied nature such as second messengers and aromatic compounds that might potentially bind to some of these LuxRs harboring the GAF/PAS domains and thus participate in QS or in stress-response phenomena suggesting that these mycobacterial proteins might have in other physiological processes important for survival of the bacteria as an individual or as a community in various.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of BLUF-photoreceptors present in Acinetobacter nosocomialis. 95%
- Comparative in silico analysis of ftsZ gene from different bacteria reveals the preference for core set of codons in coding sequence structuring and secondary structural elements determination 95%
- Revisiting the expression signature of pks15/1 unveils regulatory patterns controlling phenolphtiocerol and phenolglycolipid production in pathogenic mycobacteria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization and description of Faecalibacterium butyricigenerans sp. nov. and F. longum sp. nov., isolated from human faeces 94%
- Comparative genome analysis of a multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa sequence type 277 clone that harbours two copies of the blaSPM-1 gene and multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms in other resistance-associated genes 93%
- Antimicrobial resistance determinants in silage 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Small RNA profiling in Mycobacterium insights into stress adapt ability 94%
- Quorum Sensing Regulators and Non-ribosomal Peptide Synthetases Govern Antibacterial Secretions in Xenorhabdus szentirmaii 93%
- Listening to bacterial Esperanto: transcriptome reprogramming in a plant beneficial rhizobacterium 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive genomic analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae and its temperate N-15-like phage: From isolation to functional annotation 93%
- CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knockout of SagD gene for overexpression of streptokinase in Streptococcus equisimilis 93%
- Expression of Bacillus cereus Virulence-Related Genes in an Ocular Infection-Related Environment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolution end classification of tfd gene clusters mediating bacterial degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) 92%
- Investigating pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus pettenkoferi: an emerging pathogen 91%
- Computationally reconstructed interactome of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110 reveals novel functional modules and protein hubs for symbiotic nitrogen fixation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.