Back

Motor Hotspot Localization Based on Electroencephalography Using Convolutional Neural Network in Patients with Stroke

Choi, G.-Y.; Seo, J.-K.; Kim, K. T.; Chang, W. K.; Paik, N.-J.; Kim, W.-S.; Hwang, H.-J.

2024-03-11 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.03.06.583618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is the optimal tool for identifying individual motor hotspots for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), it requires a cumbersome procedure in which patients must visit the hospital each time and rely on expert judgment to determine the motor hotspot. Therefore, in previous study, we proposed electroencephalography (EEG)-based machine learning approach to automatically identify individual motor hotspots. In this study, we proposed an advanced EEG-based motor hotspot identification algorithm using a deep learning model and assessed its clinical feasibility and benefits by applying it to stroke patient EEGs. MethodsEEG data were measured from thirty subjects as they performed a simple hand movement task. We utilized the five types of input data depending on the processing levels to assess the signal processing capability of our proposed deep learning model. The motor hotspot locations were estimated using a two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The error distance between the 3D coordinate information of the individual motor hotspots identified by the TMS (ground truth) and EEGs was calculated using the Euclidean distance. Additionally, we confirmed the clinical benefits of our proposed deep-learning algorithm by applying the EEG of stroke patients. ResultsA mean error distance between the motor hotspot locations identified by TMS and our approach was 2.34 {+/-} 0.19 mm when using raw data from only 9 channels around the motor area. When it was tested on stroke patients, the mean error distance was 1.77 {+/-} 0.15 mm using only 5 channels around the motor area. ConclusionWe have demonstrated that an EEG-based deep learning approach can effectively identify the individual motor hotspots. Moreover, we validated the clinical benefits of our algorithm by successfully implementing it in stroke patients. Our algorithm can be used as an alternative to TMS for identifying motor hotspots and maximizing rehabilitation effectiveness.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
7
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
10
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%