Task structure tailors the geometry of neural representations in human lateral prefrontal cortex
Bhandari, A.; Keglovits, H.; Chicklis, E.; Badre, D.
Show abstract
How do human brains represent tasks of varying structure? The lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC) flexibly represents task information. However, principles that shape lPFC representational geometry remain unsettled. We use fMRI and pattern analyses to reveal the structure of lPFC representational geometries as humans perform two distinct categorization tasks- one with flat, conjunctive categories and another with hierarchical, context-dependent categories. We show that lPFC encodes task-relevant information with task-tailored geometries of intermediate dimensionality. These geometries preferentially enhance the separability of task-relevant variables while encoding a subset in abstract form. Specifically, in the flat task, a global axis encodes response-relevant categories abstractly, while category-specific local geometries are high-dimensional. In the hierarchy task, a global axis abstractly encodes the higher-level context, while low-dimensional, context-specific local geometries compress irrelevant information and abstractly encode the relevant information. Trial-by-trial variability in neural patterns along the global coding axes in each task structure was associated with behavioral variability. Comparing these task geometries exposes generalizable principles by which lPFC tailors representations to different tasks.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hippocampal representations switch from errors to predictions during acquisition of predictive associations 98%
- Investigating action topography in visual cortex and deep artificial neural networks 97%
- Object representations in the human brain reflect the co-occurrence statistics of vision and language 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.