Evaluation of a novel respiratory virus inactivating buffer for parallel RT-qPCR and quick antigen testing
Deprez, S.; Steyaert, S.; Claeys, M.; Verhasselt, L.; Vandesompele, J.
Show abstract
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitals implemented a dual testing procedure for SARS-CoV-2 to assess the infection risk of an admitted patient. To allow for a short turn-around time, rapid antigen (Ag) testing via lateral flow tests (LFT) is combined with nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), requiring two nasopharyngeal swab collections. In this study, a novel, universal pathogen inactivation buffer (DNA/RNA Defend Pro (DRDP)) was evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 inactivation and simultaneous Ag and DNA/RNA stabilization. In an emergency department setting of a General Hospital in Ghent (Belgium), patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2, whereby a LFT for Ag detection (Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test) was performed in combination with sample collection for NAAT (Abbott Alinity m). Left-over buffers from LFT were diluted in DRDP to evaluate LFT and NAAT results after dilution. Thirty-six patients were included in the data analysis. Twenty-three diagnostic LFT results were available in the laboratory information system of which all corresponded with results after dilution with DRDP. When correlating NAAT results, seven out of eight positive test results were in agreement, compared to twenty-three out of twenty-five negative results. For thirty-four out of thirty-six samples, LFT and NAAT after dilution with DRDP yielded the same conclusion. Additionally, RNA stability in DRDP was demonstrated when stored for three days at room temperature. At the extreme, a sample stored in the DRDP buffer for 53 days at room temperature was still very positive (Cq 21.95). We demonstrated that, for the first time, a novel collection buffer could inactivate a pathogen (SARS-CoV-2) while also preserving antigen (for rapid antigen testing) and RNA (for molecular testing). This novel buffer holds promise for a single specimen to be used for both antigen and molecular testing in a safe working environment.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 96%
- Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR 96%
- Impaired performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid tests at elevated temperatures 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating sensitivity of nasal or throat (ISNOT): A combination of both swabs increases sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests 96%
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 96%
- Generation of false positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen results with testing conditions outside manufacturer recommendations: A scientific approach to pandemic misinformation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 96%
- Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory Developed Assays for in vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories 95%
- Performance of Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 rapid nucleic acid amplification test in nasopharyngeal swabs transported in viral media and dry nasal swabs, in a New York City academic institution 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation and modelling of the performance of an automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay according to sample type, target population and epidemic trends 97%
- Reducing the Cost of Rapid Antigen Tests through Swab Pooling and Extraction in a Device 95%
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 96%
- Fully automated detection and differentiation of pandemic and endemic coronaviruses (NL63, 229E, HKU1, OC43 and SARS-CoV-2) on the Hologic Panther Fusion 96%
- Clinical evaluation of an automated, rapid mariPOC ® antigen test in screening of symptomatics and asymptomatics for SARS-CoV-2 infections 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.