Predicting drug outcome of population via clinical knowledge graph
Brbic, M.; Yasunaga, M.; Agarwal, P.; Leskovec, J.
Show abstract
Optimal treatments depend on numerous factors such as drug chemical properties, disease biology, and patient characteristics to which the treatment is applied. To realize the promise of AI in healthcare, there is a need for designing systems that can capture patient heterogeneity and relevant biomedical knowledge. Here we present PlaNet, a geometric deep learning framework that reasons over population variability, disease biology, and drug chemistry by representing knowledge in the form of a massive clinical knowledge graph that can be enhanced by language models. Our framework is applicable to any sub-population, any drug as well drug combinations, any disease, and a wide range of pharmacological tasks. We apply the PlaNet framework to reason about outcomes of clinical trials: PlaNet predicts drug efficacy and adverse events, even for experimental drugs and their combinations that have never been seen by the model. Furthermore, PlaNet can estimate the effect of changing population on trial outcomes with direct implications for patient stratification in clinical trials. PlaNet takes fundamental steps towards AI-guided clinical trials design, offering valuable guidance for realizing the vision of precision medicine using AI.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Combinatorial prediction of therapeutic perturbations using causally-inspired neural networks 96%
- Identifying perturbations that boost T-cell infiltration into tumours via counterfactual learning of their spatial proteomic profiles 95%
- Ultra-fast Prediction of Somatic Structural Variations by Reduced Read Mapping via Pan-Genome k-mer Sets 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.