Self-organization of embryonic stem cells into a reproducible embryo model through epigenome editing
Lodewijk, G. A.; Kozuki, S.; Han, C.; Topacio, B. R.; Zargari, A.; Lee, S.; Knight, G.; Ashton, R.; Qi, L. S.; Shariati, S. A.
Show abstract
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can self-organize in vitro into developmental patterns with spatial organization and molecular similarity to that of early embryonic stages. This self-organization of ESCs requires transmission of signaling cues, via addition of small molecule chemicals or recombinant proteins, to induce distinct embryonic cellular fates and subsequent assembly into structures that can mimic aspects of early embryonic development. During natural embryonic development, different embryonic cell types co-develop together, where each cell type expresses specific fate-inducing transcription factors through activation of non-coding regulatory elements and interactions with neighboring cells. However, previous studies have not fully explored the possibility of engineering endogenous regulatory elements to shape self-organization of ESCs into spatially-ordered embryo models. Here, we hypothesized that cell-intrinsic activation of a minimum number of such endogenous regulatory elements is sufficient to self-organize ESCs into early embryonic models. Our results show that CRISPR-based activation (CRISPRa) of only two endogenous regulatory elements in the genome of pluripotent stem cells is sufficient to generate embryonic patterns that show spatial and molecular resemblance to that of pre-gastrulation mouse embryonic development. Quantitative single-cell live fluorescent imaging showed that the emergence of spatially-ordered embryonic patterns happens through the intrinsic induction of cell fate that leads to an orchestrated collective cellular motion. Based on these results, we propose a straightforward approach to efficiently form 3D embryo models through intrinsic CRISPRa-based epigenome editing and independent of external signaling cues. CRISPRa-Programmed Embryo Models (CPEMs) show highly consistent composition of major embryonic cell types that are spatially-organized, with nearly 80% of the structures forming an embryonic cavity. Single cell transcriptomics confirmed the presence of main embryonic cell types in CPEMs with transcriptional similarity to pre-gastrulation mouse embryos and revealed novel signaling communication links between different embryonic cell types. Our findings offer a programmable embryo model and demonstrate that minimum intrinsic epigenome editing is sufficient to self-organize ESCs into highly consistent pre-gastrulation embryo models
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Major transcriptomic, epigenetic and metabolic changes underly the pluripotency continuum in rabbit preimplantation embryos 95%
- Rapid and robust directed differentiation of mouse epiblast stem cells into definitive endoderm and forebrain organoids 95%
- Axial Elongation of Caudalized Human Organoids Mimics Neural Tube Development 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differentiation Success of Reprogrammed Cells is Heterogenous In Vivo and Modulated by Somatic Cell Identity Memory 95%
- Gastruloids generated without exogenous Wnt activation develop anterior neural tissues 95%
- A Rainbow Reporter Tracks Single Cells and Reveals Heterogeneous Cellular Dynamics among Pluripotent Stem Cells and their Differentiated Derivatives 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A toolkit for mapping cell identities in relation to neighbours reveals Notch-dependent heterogeneity within neuromesodermal progenitor populations 94%
- High-throughput micro-patterning platform reveals Nodal-dependent dissection of peri-gastrulation-associated versus pre-neurulation associated fate patterning 94%
- Generation and Validation of Versatile Inducible CRISPRi Embryonic Stem Cell and Mouse Models 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.