Back

Step-wise evolution of azole resistance through copy number variation followed by KSR1 loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans.

Zande, P. V.; Gautier, C.; Kawar, N.; Maufrais, C.; Metzner, K.; Wash, E.; Beach, A. K.; Bracken, R.; Maciel, E. I.; Fernandes, C. M.; Solis, N. V.; Del Poeta, M.; Filler, S. G.; Berman, J.; Ene, I. V.; Selmecki, A.

2024-03-05 microbiology
10.1101/2024.03.05.583528 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial drug resistance poses a global health threat, requiring a deeper understanding of the evolutionary processes that lead to its emergence in pathogens. Complex evolutionary dynamics involve multiple mutations that can result in cooperative or competitive (clonal interference) effects. Candida albicans, a major fungal pathogen, displays high rates of copy number variation (CNV) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). CNV and LOH events involve large numbers of genes and could synergize during evolutionary adaptation. Understanding the contributions of CNV and LOH to antifungal drug adaptation is challenging, especially in the context of whole-population genome sequencing. Here, we document the sequential evolution of fluconazole tolerance and then resistance in a C. albicans isolate involving an initial CNV on chromosome 4, followed by an LOH on chromosome R that involves KSR1. Similar LOH events involving KSR1, which encodes a reductase involved in sphingolipid biosynthesis, were also detected in independently evolved fluconazole resistant isolates. We dissect the specific KSR1 codons that affect fluconazole resistance and tolerance. The combination of the chromosome 4 CNV and KSR1 LOH results in a >500-fold increase in azole resistance, illustrating a compelling example of rapid, yet step-wise, interplay between CNV and LOH in drug resistance evolution.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.