Uterine Fibroids and Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nasab, S.; Gough, E.; Nylander, E.; Borahay, M.; Segars, J.; Baker, V.; Wang, X.; Cameron, K.
Show abstract
CapsuleIn this study the presence of uterine fibroids was significantly associated with an increased risk of development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy even when accounting for age and BMI in meta-regression. This finding has potential implications for risk stratification and monitoring for hypertension during pregnancy in this population. ObjectiveTo examine the association between uterine fibroids and the development of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Data sourcesCochrane, Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through April 2023. Study Selection and SynthesisCohort, case-control, or case series studies including uterine fibroid status and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy status were included. The comparison group was pregnant women without uterine fibroids. Inverse-variance weighted random effects models were used to pool RR and OR estimates separately. Age and BMI were explored as potential sources of heterogeneity using inverse-variance weighted meta-regression. Main OutcomesHypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) defined as gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, superimposed preeclampsia, or hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. ResultsA total of 17 studies were included (Total N=1,374,395 participants, N=64,968 with uterine fibroids). Thirteen studies were retrospective cohorts and four were case-control studies. Women with uterine fibroids had a significantly higher risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy compared to women without uterine fibroids with RR 1.74 (95% CI 1.33-2.27, p<0.01), and OR 2.87 (95% CI 1.38-5.97, p<0.01), in cohort studies and case-control studies, respectively. In meta-regression analyses, age did not significantly change the positive association between uterine fibroids and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. ConclusionUterine fibroids were associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy when all available literature was synthesized, including when shared risk factors are examined in meta-regression analyses. RelevanceIf confirmed in future studies, investigations into the mechanisms of this association are needed as this finding potentially has implications for risk stratification and monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in this population. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO, ID # 331528
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A compelling symmetry: The extended fetuses-at-risk perspective on modal, optimal and relative birthweight and gestational age 94%
- Urinary prostaglandin metabolites as biomarkers for human labour: Insights into future predictors 93%
- Changes in pregnancy-related serum biomarkers early in gestation are associated with later development of preeclampsia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: A wide-angled Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Association of heavy menstrual bleeding with cardiovascular diseases in US female hospitalizations 93%
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint associations of pregnancy complications and postpartum maternal renal biomarkers with severe cardiovascular morbidities: A US racially diverse prospective birth cohort study 94%
- Preterm birth and cardiometabolic health trajectories from birth to adulthood: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children 93%
- Concentrations and immunostimulatory potential of circulating cell-free membrane-bound and membrane-unbound mitochondrial DNA in preeclampsia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.